Group 2 - Gate 3
Contents |
Gate 3: Product Analysis
Project Management: Coordination Review
Cause for Corrective Action
Our group functioned well while working on Gate 3. There were no major issues among members or with tasks assigned to members. There were also no disagreements over any topic directly related or not related to the gate. However, there were some issues that we would like to improve upon for the next gate.
The first was timeline of project completion. Our gate was finished very close to the deadline. We planned to work ahead and have some time to review our work thoroughly, but that time did not materialize. This can be attributed in part to midterms that group members had. During the week in which Gate 3 was due, there were several tests, often more than one on the same day. This affected when the group could work on the gate. For the next gate, we will attempt to complete the work needed ahead of time, so that issues like tests will not affect the group's performance on the gate.
A minor problem we ran into was that of communication. Our group did not communicate well enough while working on this gate. However, that was not a major detriment because even though communication was not perfect, we got work done well enough to finish ahead of the due date. We can improve this flaw by sending more frequent text messages to the group, and making phone calls to group members.
Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation
Component Summary
| Name of Component | Function | Material Used | Manufacturing Process Used | Model or Part Number | Picture of Part |
| Throttle Body | Uses a valve to allow air into the engine. | Outer part made of cast iron, butterfly valve made of aluminum, some small plastic parts. | Method: Iron is die cast, aluminum is forged, plastic is injection molded. All parts are machined for detail. Evidence: The uneven weight distribution is a sign that the throttle body is made up of different types of material. Part lines around the outside of the throttle body suggest that it was cast in a die, the detail along the flat butterfly valve suggests that it was forged and the part lines along the plastic components suggest that injection molding was used. Material impact: Plastic was used for parts which had little to do with the functionality of the component as the plastic components are cheaper to make. Shape impact: The complexity in the function and shape of the throttle body made it so that multiple materials needed to be used to produce the part efficiently. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: The quality of this component greatly influences the lifespan of the product. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
617691-B | |
| Manifold Cover | Protective cover over the intake manifold that prevents damage. | Plastic | Method: Injection molding Evidence: Part lines can be seen along the Manifold cover as well as the fact that many plastic components are made by injection molding. Material impact: Due to the fact that the manifold cover does not have a high functionality, it does not need to be made of a sturdy material such as cast iron or cast aluminum. Shape impact: due to the low functionality of the component injection molding was the most efficient way to create the component Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: Plastic is cheaper to make and the most efficient to produce a plastic part in high mass is through injection molding. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
17090544 | |
| Alternator | Converts mechanical energy into electrical energy. | Cast aluminum, plastic, steel | Method: Aluminum is die cast and machined, plastic part was manufactured through injection molded, the components were fastened together using screws and bolts. Evidence: part lines can be seen on the aluminum and plastic portions of the alternator. Screws can be seen which attach the plastic housing of the alternator components to the aluminum backing. Material impact: The housing of the alternator components are plastic due to the fact that the plastic would not affect the magnets in the alternator, aluminum also has a low magnetism making it a material which would not affect the alternator. Shape impact: Injection molding and casting are both geometrically capable of creating the parts necessary for the Alternator. Global factor influence: little influence societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: These components were created using casting and injection molding because they were the most economically efficient ways to produce the parts. Environmental factor influence: little influence. |
N/A | |
| Water Pipe | Brings water in to cool the engine. | Base is made of steel, pipe made of iron | Method: the Base of the water pipe forged, pipe is drawn, heated up and bent to desired shape. Evidence: Flash can be seen around the edges of the base which is a sign of forging. The thinness of the pipe and its length are both signs of something which has been drawn or pulled. the ridges along the bent parts of the pipe suggest that the pipe was initially straight and was then bent to meet the desired shape. Material impact: Iron is a sturdy material which can be easily drawn and bent making it the optimal choice for manufacturing. Shape impact: Due to the cylindrical pipe shape which pipes are generally made drawing was the most efficient way to create this part. The use of water to cool the engine is a very efficient and cheap way to prevent the engine from over heating Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: drawing is an efficient way of making pipes without wasting material. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Water Valve | Allows the correct amount of water into the engine. | Aluminum | Method: The Disc-like parts of the water valve are forged, the springs are drawn and then heated up, and coiled in order to give then there elastic like properties. Evidence: The general shape of the component implies that forging would be the most efficient way to create the part. The spring is made of cylindrical wire which is often created through drawing and is then put through heated up and coils to give it its elastic properties. Material impact: The materials had very little influence as the materials were most likely chosen based upon the shapes needed. Shape impact:The shape of the component was most likely the influential factor which influenced why many of the parts were forged, this is largely due to the fact that many of the parts were thin cylindrical metal parts. Many wire shaped components are created using drawing or pulling operations. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: drawing is the most efficient way to make wires making it more economic. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
92 | |
| Performance Sensor | Relays engine performance information to the user in the form of electrical signals | Plastic, iron, and aluminum | Method: Plastic parts were created using injection molded, the iron parts were forged and bent, and the aluminum parts were machined. The internal components of the Performance sensor could not be analyzed for method of manufacturing as taking apart the housing would result in destroying the function of the part. Evidence: The plastic components have part lines which is a sign of injection mold, the aluminum component which is a heat sink for the sensor is cut and finished and the iron portions of the housing have flash in areas. Material impact: The plastic components are most efficiently made using injection molding. shape impact: The shape of the heat sink which has multiple rows of aluminum plates all of which are connected appears difficult to create using something more efficient like casting or forging. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: the heat sink on the performance sensor is designed to prevent the performance sensor from over heating. If the heat sink is made cheaply, performance sensor may overheat causing safety issues from a lack of knowledge of dangerous situations within the engine. Economic factor influence: little influence Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Valve Cover | Plastic cover over the piston head for protection | Plastic with rubber seals | Method: Both the plastic cover and rubber seals were made with injection molding. Evidence: part lines can be seen on the outside of the cover and the rubber seal. Material impact: The valve cover material could be plastic and rubber due to the fact that the valve cover would not be exposed to such high temperatures that the plastic would melt. Shape impact: due to the simplicity of the parts injection molding is the most efficient manufacturing process to use Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: Injection molding is almost always the most cost effective way to produce plastic parts. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Distributor | Channels electrical energy from the battery to the spark plug and ensure they fire in the right order | Composed of 8 different parts made of plastic, iron, and steel | Method: The metal shaft is forged and turned, the plastic cover is injection molded, and the gear at the bottom is cast and machined. Evidence: Since the metal shaft is symmetrically round, it is most likely that it is turned. Plastic parts are almost always made with injection molding, as can be seen by the parting lines on the cap. Gears are cast to give them good dimensional consistency. |
N/A | |
| Intake Manifold | Holds all the intake tubes in their correct places and covers the top of the engine | cast iron, plastic, rubber, aluminum, brass | Method: The iron part is forged, plastic and rubber parts are injection molded, aluminum parts are cast, and brass pipes are drawn Evidence: The pipe would need to be brass because it is a softer metal, which means it is less likely to cause sparks. This is especially important on and engine where a small spark would cause an explosion. Rubber and plastic parts are always injection molded, as evidenced by the parting lines. |
25170759 | |
| Serpentine Pulley 1 | Translates motion from crankshaft to camshaft | Iron | Method: The general shape is forged and then turned to give it the ridges along the outside. Holes are drilled in place. Evidence: Part is turned because of the symmetric threads along the outside. Forging is recognized from it being made of iron as opposed to cast iron. |
10085754 | |
| Serpentine Pulley 2 | converts motion from the first pulley | Iron | Method: The general shape is forged and then turned to give it the ridges along the outside. Holes are drilled in place. Evidence: Part is turned because of the symmetric threads along the outside. Forging is recognized from it being made of iron as opposed to cast iron. |
12550055 | |
| Water Pump | Pumps water | Cast iron, steel, and aluminum | Method: Cast iron is cast and machined, steel is forged and machined, aluminum pipes are drawn Evidence: Smaller parts need to be more precise so they are forged and machined to give correct surface finish to allow for maximum efficiency. Aluminum pipes are used to prevent rusting, since steel or iron pipes would rust more quickly as water passed through them. |
10238199 | |
| Mounting brackets | Support the engine when it mounted in the car | Iron, rubber | Method: Iron parts which were originally forged and were then bent and machined to meet the desired shape, the rubber parts were made using injection molding. Evidence: There are many holes in the product which have signs of drilling as well as being bent and shaped. The rubber padding has part lines which are an obvious sign of injection molding. material impact:Injection molding is almost always the cheapest way to mass produce the detailed rubber component. Material had little impact on the iron components though. Shape impact: Because of the shape and function of the part, which is to support the engine when mounted in the car, the part had to be structurally strong. Although cast iron may have been cheaper to use to make the part, cast iron parts can have structural weaknesses due to how the material flowed into the cast. s. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: Due to the function of the part the part must be extremely strong in order to guarantee the stability of the engine in the car and the safety of the user. Economic factor influence: The most efficient way to the rubber padding would be injection molding Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Valve head (3 on each side) | Translates movement of the push-rod to the movement of the valve | Iron | Method: Forged and machined in order to create desired shape. Evidence: No part lines which would have implied cast iron, around the edges there are cut marks and a decent finish which is a sign that grinding was used. Material influence: material had little impact Shape influence: Because of the constant pressure that this component is under while the engine is functioning forging was chosen to be used over die casting because forging is often more structurally strong. This implies that the reliability of the part is important to the life span of the engine, making it a economic factor considered by the industry. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: The component must be well made to insure the lifespan of the product. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Push rod (6 on each side) | Translates movement of camshaft into movement of valve heads | Iron | Method: Rod is forged and then turned to give its smooth finish Evidence: The rod is symmetrical all the way around one axis, making it very likely that it was turned. Forging would be the most efficient way to make these, as 12 are needed for each V6 engine. |
N/A | |
| Cylinder cover (1 on each side) | Covers the cylinders, holds the valves in place (valves let in fuel and air, and let out exhaust) | Cast iron, steel | Method: Actual body is cast, while springs are made of steel that is heated and coiled Evidence: The body has parting lines on it, making it clear it was cast. The method for making springs involves drawing the steel through a die to make a wire, and then heating up the steal until it is pliable. Then it is coiled around a form and cooled to give it its shape. |
772 | |
| Lifters (6 on each side) a | Lifters lubricate the engine | Steel | Method: Each piece is individually forged and machined for a smooth surface finish and assembled. Evidence: The pieces need to be smooth so as to be able to move with the moving pistons and supply lubrication to the pistons. |
N/A | |
| Lifter Covers (2) | Hold lifters in place | Plastic | Method: Cover is injection molded Evidence: Component has parting lines where the mold was pulled apart. Also, injection molding is the most efficient and cost effective way to make plastic parts. |
N/A | |
| Oil Pan | Collect oil | Iron | Method: Oil pan is forged out of iron and then machined to add inner details Evidence: Since the part is important to the function of the engine, and a failure in the oil pan would cause a catastrophic failure of the engine, it would be forged since cast parts may have weaknesses based on the flow of the metal into the mold. |
N/A | |
| Oil filter | Filters impurities out of oil | Cast iron, steel | Method: The base of the oil filter was made through die casting, the pipe was most likely drawn and then bent to meet the desired shape, pan is forged and thh mesh is woven steel wire, the steel wire is most likely drawn. Evidence: The oil filter base has part lines, a clear cast if die casting. The pipe is most likely drawn in order to get the low thickness of the walls. The steel wires were drawn which can be seen by their thickness and shape. Material impact: Die casting is also the most economicly efficient way to make a part out of iron, assuming it is allowed through geometric limitations and structural strength. Shape impact: The shapes of the various parts of this component are what most greatly influenced the manufacturing processes used. Pipes and wire are most efficiently made through the drawing process and then bending or weving the material to get its desired shape. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: The part is made of high quality due to the importance of the part on the performance to the engine. Economic factor influence: little influence Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Crankshaft caps (2 on each side) | Hold the crankshaft in place | Cast iron | Method: The crankshaft caps were manufactured using Die casting and grinded and drilling to finish the product. Evidence: The weight of the part suggests that it is made of iron, the part was then greatly machined using grinding to give the part its smooth finish and drilling to create the holes for the bolts. Material impact: little influence shape impact: The shape of the part most likely played the most influential role in the type of manufacturing process used. Because of the other parts that it would be rubbing against it would require a very smooth surface finish. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: The low coefficient of friction on the crankshaft caps is necessary to improve the performance of the engine Economic factor influence: Casting is the most efficient way to create the crankshaft caps. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Piston (3 on each side) | Moves up and down in different stages of combustion to produce rotatory motion of the crankshaft | Cast iron, steel | Method: Die cast, machined and assembled, steel piston rings forged
Evidence: The piston has part lines and a rough material found on the surface. The steal piston rings forged for strength and for large scale production. The piston needs to be made accurately so to minimize friction, this result in machining processes to be made such as turning and milling. |
Different on different pistons | |
| Engine block | It holds all engine components in place | Cast Iron | Method: Die Casting iron Evidence: Part lines on the outside of the engine block are signs of Die casting. Material impact: Iron's good fluidity and castability makes die casting the favored method of manufacturing. shape impact: The geometric shape of the engine block makes it a suitable fit for die casting. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: The high volume of engine blocks that the industry will produce also make die casting the best economic choice for manufacturing. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
090G-4 | |
| Exhaust manifold (1 on each side) | Channels exhaust gases away from the engine | Cast iron | Method: the exhaust manifolds were manufactured using die casting and holes were drilled for bolts. Evidence: The part lines on the exhaust manifold suggests that it was made using die casting and the holes were most likely drilled. The rough finish of the exhaust manifold also suggests that die casting was used. Material impact: The material used, cast iron, most likely was the dominatinating factor in using die cast to make the part. The hot exhaust required a material with a high melting point to be used for the exhaust manifold to insure the shape of the component and the saftey of the consumer. Shape impact: the geometric shape of the exhaust manifold made it so that die casting can be used. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: A material had to be used with a high melting point in order protect the user from the hot exhaust. Economic factor influence: little influence Environmental factor influence: little influence |
125501220 | |
| Crankshaft | It translates the vertical motion of the pistons into rotatory motion | Iron | Method: The crankshaft was Forged and then grinded for finishing properties. Evidence: Lack of part lines suggests that the crankshaft was not die cast. the texture of the surface of the crankshaft also suggests that it was forged and then grinded to give the product it's finish. Material impact: little influence Shape impact: Due to the large forces which are going to be applied to the crankshaft die casting cannot be used as the material flow into the cast often creates material weaknesses. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: little influence Economic factor influence: Forging has a greated structural integrity and is used for the Crankshaft because the durability of this piece greatly affects the lifespan of the engine. Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A | |
| Gear train, chain | Change the ratio of the rotatory motion of the drive shaft | Iron | Method: Gears are manufactured through investement casting, the chain links are forged for the chain and the pins are drawn and grinded for finish, the components are then assembled together using the pins as fastners. Evidence: Gears are detailed and have parts which would have been unable to achieve through die cast due to the precision of die casting. The chains links are clearly forged due to their two dimensionality and the mass production that would need to be used to make the chains. The pins are most likely drawn into solid wire due to the symmetry of each part. Material impact: little influence Shape impact: The shape of the parts used to make up the chain link and sproket is what most greatly influenced the manufacturing process used. The gears require a very high precision in order to ensure the accuracy of the chain link and sproket systems, this could only be done through investment casting. Global factor influence: little influence. Societal factor influence: The precision of this component greatly influences the performance of the engine. Economic factor influence: little influence Environmental factor influence: little influence |
N/A |
- Table 1: Component Summary
Product Analysis
Engine Block
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 2: Engine Block
- Table 2: Engine Block
Crankshaft
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 3: Crankshaft
- Table 3: Crankshaft
Camshaft-Distributor
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 4: Camshaft-Distributor
- Table 4: Camshaft-Distributor
Water Pump
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 5: Water Pump
- Table 5: Water Pump
Intake Manifold
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 6: Intake Manifold
- Table 6: Intake Manifold
Piston
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 7: Pistons
- Table 7: Pistons
Exhaust Manifold
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 8: Exhaust Manifold
- Table 8: Exhaust Manifold
Alternator
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 9: Alternator
- Table 9: Alternator
Oil Filter
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 10: Oil Filter
- Table 10: Oil Filter
Throttle Body
| Component Function |
|
| Component Form |
|
| Aesthetics |
|
- Table 11: Throttle Body
- Table 11: Throttle Body
Complexity Scale
| Value | Complexity | Interaction Complexity |
| 1 | A component is given a complexity rating of 1 if it appears to have a relatively simple geometry making it simple to manufacture. i.e. only die casting or injection molding is used. | A component is given a interaction complexity of 1 if Performs a very simple action and directly interacts with 2 or less components |
| 2 | A component is given a complexity rating of 2 if it has a significantly more complex geometry and requires multiple steps to manufacturing process or requires assembly of parts to create the component | A component is given an interaction complexity of 2 if it Performs a complex action but interacts with very few components or performs a simple action but directly interacts with multiple components |
| 3 | A component is given a complexity rating of 3 if it has Complex geometry and requires many steps in the manufacturing process possibly including assembly | A component is given an interaction complexity of 3 if it Performs a very complex action and interacts with many of the components in the engine directly. |
- Table 11: Complexity Scale
- Table 11: Complexity Scale
| Component | Complexity | Reasoning | Interaction Complexity | Reasoning |
| Engine Block | 1 | Engine blocks are easily made using die casting, and do not require much machining afterwards to make them useable | 3 | Every system in the engine is tied in one way or another to the engine block, whether it be the cooling process or the actual creation of energy to power the vehicle |
| Crankshaft | 2 | Involves some extra machining after the original forging to make the offset crank-pins | 2 | Though the motion is very simple (just a turning motion) it interacts with many parts of the engine such as the camshaft, pistons, and push-rods |
| Camshaft-distributor | 2 | Simple geometry made by forging, however there are many parts to manufacture and then assemble | 2 | Motion is simple (just 2 spinning shafts) but the interaction with each other, as well as the spark plugs, crankshaft, balancing chain, and balancing shaft make it more complex |
| Water Pump | 2 | Outside is not difficult to cast, but the small, very dimensional specific inner parts, such as the turbine blade, are more difficult to make since they require multiple processes | 1 | Only performs the simple task of drawing water and distributing it throughout the engine to keep it cool |
| Intake Manifold | 1 | Can easily be cast | 2 | Though it seems much more complicated, the only components the intake manifold interacts with are the pistons, and the only input materials it deals with are air and fuel |
| Piston | 2 | Part needs to be ground down after it is originally forged to make it smooth enough | 3 | The piston interacts with many other components, such as the crankshaft, camshaft, distributor, and intake manifold. It also has a complex motion, as the piston system as a whole must fire in a very specific order to power the engine |
| Exhaust Manifold | 1 | Part would just be cast, one of the easiest manufacturing processes | 1 | Only interaction is with the pistons, as it take away the exhaust produced |
| Alternator | 2 | The visible part is easy to make through casting, however the internal components that we cannot see could be more difficult, leading to a higher ranking | 2 | The conversion process is fairly complicated, even though it seems very direct |
| Oil Filter | 2 | Outside part is not difficult to cast, but the small gears on the inside as well as the filter itself involve some more complex manufacturing processes | 1 | The oil filter only interacts with the oil pan and only uses a mesh to filter and gears to create a vacuum, none of which are very complicated processes. |
| Throttle Body | 1 | The parts are either forged or cast, meaning very easy manufacturing | 2 | The throttle needs to handle the human input from the accelerator and open the clutch accordingly, providing the power the vehicle needs to work |
- Table 12: Component Complexity
Solid Model Assembly
For our solid modeling, we used Inventor to draw the components of the piston and crankshaft system. We chose this system because it is the central system of the engine, and has many interconnecting components.
As stated before these components were chosen because they provide the driving force of an engine. After the piston are initially started by an external force they proved the linear energy to turn the crankshaft and provide rotary energy. The piston fasteners connect the piston to the crankshaft that allow this transfer of energy to take place. In order for the engine to provide reliable energy and minimize energy loss through vibrations the crankshaft must be secured in away that allows it to rotate. The crankshaft fastener must be secure enough to support the crankshaft but also minimize friction and vibrations.
These parts were built using Autodesk Inventor Professional 2011(Student Version). The reason we decided to use this program was the experience that some members of the group had with this program. In the past on high school projects and during personal projects Autodesk Inventor has been an efficient and successful modeling tool. Being familiar with the system and features of the program allowed the the solid modeling assembly become an easier task. Inventor also has very useful features such as Inventor Studio and Presentation which allows the user to render pictures with customizable lighting and graphics. The presentation feature also allows the user to disassemble a system and reassemble it.
These are the 8 components that went into the assembly drawing of our engine:
This is how the model would be assembled:
This is the final assembly drawing of these components on our engine:
Engineering Analysis
A very important characteristic of engine performance is firing order of the cylinders. The firing order of the cylinders refers to the order in which sparks are introduced into the cylinders of the engine. This determines when combustion occurs in every piston, which further determines when the crankshaft is given an additional boost of power due to movement of the piston following combustion.
Before firing order is determined, it is important to number the cylinders correctly. This enables engineers to properly determine and communicate the firing order to other personnel in the design, development and manufacture divisions. Our GM 4.3L V6 Vortec engine uses the following numbering.
Each engine produced in the market has a specific requirement. It is produced to meet requirements such as but not limited to high top speed of the vehicle, high torque (pulling and weight hauling power), or high efficiency. Often, the best engine to suit a specific requirement has a combination of more than one of these factors. Engineering analysis in this case can be used to determine the firing order of the engine by analyzing what parameters of engine performance are affected by the firing order.
In the problem statement of this analysis, the engineer should list the required characteristics of the engine as given information. An engineer who performs this analysis will know whether the engine whose firing order is to be determined is going to be used for its performance (in the case of a race car - top speed - or a van - pulling capability) or its efficiency and smoothness (family sedan). The firing order of the engine can significantly impact these characteristics. The problem statement will also include the information to be determined. In this analysis, although the result should be an appropriate firing order, the engineer should determine how many cylinders should fire at a given instant.
The system diagram will contain the general layout of the engine. In this case, the GM engine is a V6. This presents the engineer with a general idea of how the pistons are arranged and helps him or her visualize how they should move. A flow diagram can also be included to show the output of power when cylinders fire. A piston produces power only in the combustion stroke, but consumes power in the intake, compression and exhaust strokes. This has to be taken into consideration when determining the firing order. A flow diagram of the functioning of a single piston can be drawn. This diagram can then be placed in parallel with itself, because pistons work in parallel. How these flows are placed in parallel will determine when firing occurs and in which piston in occurs.
In this analysis, most of the information the engineer uses is determined in the calculations, or is provided.
The most important equations used in the calculations are -
1. Crank angle = 720˚ / Number of cylinders in the engine (720˚is because each piston completes its 4 step cycle as the crankshaft rotates 720˚)
2. Number of pistons required for a complete rotation = 360˚ / Crank angle
3. Number of cylinders at top dead center = Total number of pistons / Number of pistons required for a complete rotation
The discussion for this analysis problem should have all the explanation necessary for the reader to understand how the firing order is determined. Each piston finished the 4 steps of the piston cycle as the crankshaft rotates twice. The total number of pistons for each cycle can be found, and the number of pistons at the top dead center can be found. The top dead center is the position of the piston at which it is located farthest from the crankshaft, so cylinder volume is minimum. In the piston cycle, this occurs twice - once just before ignition, and once after the exhaust has been expelled. At this stage, the engineer has calculated the number of pistons at the top dead center. The engineer now makes a decision on how many pistons at the top dead center fire at the same time. This firing at the same time leads to greater power because more than one piston is in its power stroke at that given time. However, this also causes greater vibrations. This choice will be based on the engine requirements. Alternately, the engineer can choose to let just one piston fire at a time. This leads to smooth power delivery and lower noise, but leads to less power also. This can be done by redesigning the cam shaft and distributor circuit.
Several examples of alteration of firing order to improve performance exist. One example is performance oriented improvement of firing order in NASCAR.
The firing order of the engine we are working on is 1-6-5-4-3-2.
Design Revisions
1) Change from Single Point Fuel Injection to Direct Fuel InjectionThough direct injection is more expensive to add (since it is made of materials that can withstand higher temperatures and pressures), it is worth it. Direct injection injects fuel at a higher pressure with more precise air fuel mixtures based on the driving conditions, which increases efficiency. This decreases emissions and, in the long run, makes up for the increased price by saving the driver money on gas.
90 degree V6 engines, such as the 4.3 Liter V6 engine we are analyzing are often prone to high vibrations due to the large width of the engine. Many 90 degree V6 engines are based on the design of similar V8 engines which simply have taken two pistons taken out of the design of the cylinder block. This creates an unneccesarily large width which in turn causes high vibration, these high vibrations can cause damage to engine parts and can make the ride uncomfortable for the passangers. If the cylinder bank angle were to be decreased to 60 degrees we can minimize the width of the engine and decrease the vibrations caused by the pistons firing.
A turbocharger would allow this V6 engine to output power at a V8 clip while keeping V6 fuel economy. This would mean higher miles per gallon, which leads to fewer emissions. It would also expand the market into the large truck category, where the only engine available was the V8. This would improve GM's profits and put them on level ground with Ford.
References
[1] "2002 GMC S15/T15 Jimmy 2WD 4.3 liter V-6 VIN "W"." . N.p., n.d.
Web. 18 Nov 2011.
<http://autorepair.about.com/library/firing_orders/bl-fo-1573.htm>.
[2] "Engine smoothness." . N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov 2011.
<http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/smooth3.htm>.
[3] "What determines engine firing order?." . N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov
2011. <http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/what-determines-engine-firing-order-103531.html>.
[4] "The physics of: engine cylinder block angles." . N.p, n.d. Web 18 Nov 2011.
<http://www.caranddriver.com/features/the-physics-of-engine-cylinder-bank-angles-feature>.
[5] Parker, Akweli "How Direct Injection Engines Work". N.p,n.d. Web 15 Dec 2011. <http://auto.howstuffworks.com/direct-injection-engine1.htm>.
[6]"Turbocharger Diagnosis & Repair" . N.p, n.d. Web 15 Dec 2011. <http://www.aa1car.com/library/turbo_repair.htm>.





