Group 9 - Poulan Leaf Blower - Revision history

Phillipcormier: moved Group 9 - Product Name Here to Group 9 - Poulan Leaf Blower

2011-12-20T18:27:33Z

2011-12-14T20:05:48Z

2011-12-14T17:06:30Z

Executive Summary

2011-12-13T01:22:08Z

2011-12-13T01:21:49Z

2011-12-08T21:12:25Z

2011-12-08T21:11:27Z

2011-12-08T21:09:03Z

2011-12-08T21:08:35Z

2011-12-08T20:54:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 14 December 2011
Line 27:		Line 27:


−	6.)''''' The leaf blower was then reassembled to its original condition.'''''	+	5.)''''' The leaf blower was then reassembled to its original condition.'''''

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 14 December 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:


−	3.) '''''Analysed each component and related the component's development to the four factors.'''''	+	3.) '''''Analysed each component and related the component's development to the four factors. During the development, questions about functionality, aesthetics, and manufacturing had to be addressed.'''''

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 13 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== '''Group 9 - Leaf Blower'''==		== '''Group 9 - Leaf Blower'''==

−	'''Group Members:''' ~~Peter~~ Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia	+	'''Group Members:''' Pete Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 13 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== '''Group 9 - Leaf Blower'''==		== '''Group 9 - Leaf Blower'''==

−	'''Group Members:''' ~~Pete~~ Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia	+	'''Group Members:''' Peter Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 8 December 2011
Line 55:		Line 55:
	----		----

−	[[Image:Leafblower.jpg\|frame\|none\|alt=alt text\|This is the leaf blower that we ~~will study~~.]]	+	[[Image:Leafblower.jpg\|frame\|none\|alt=alt text\|This is the leaf blower that we studied.]]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 Although the leaf blower is a very effective tool, we feel that there are several improvements that can be made to the current design. Potential improvements are detailed in gates 3 and 4.
 In conclusion, it is fair to say that engineering played an important role in the creation of the leaf blower. Without engineers to analyse how a design consideration would effect functionality, cost, and ease of use, the leaf blower would be incapable of functioning as it is intended to. Every component must be individually considered to form a safe and reliable final product.
 ----

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == '''Group 9 - Leaf Blower'''==
-Group Members: Pete Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia
+'''Group Members:''' Pete Eichensehr, Nick Barnhard, Jason Santangelo, Chris Mayer, Travis Zappia
-−
-−
-−

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
-----
 == Executive Summary ==
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 Although the leaf blower is a very effective tool, we feel that there are several improvements that can be made to the current design. Potential improvements are detailed in gates 3 and 4.
+In conclusion, it is fair to say that engineering played an important role in the creation of the leaf blower. Without engineers to analyse how a design consideration would effect functionality, cost, and ease of use, the leaf blower would be incapable of functioning as it is intended to. Every component must be individually considered to form a safe and reliable final product.
 ----

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 8 December 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:


−	Although the ~~leave~~ blower is a very effective tool, we feel that there are several improvements that can be made to the current design. Potential improvements are detailed in gates 3 and 4.	+	Although the leaf blower is a very effective tool, we feel that there are several improvements that can be made to the current design. Potential improvements are detailed in gates 3 and 4.