Group 6 - Kobalt 1/2 in Impact Wrench - Revision history

MAE 277 2012 - Group 6 at 01:51, 14 December 2012

2012-12-14T01:51:24Z

2012-12-14T01:51:04Z

2012-12-14T01:50:54Z

2012-12-14T01:44:10Z

2012-12-14T01:02:54Z

2012-12-14T01:02:42Z

2012-12-14T01:02:26Z

2012-12-14T01:01:57Z

2012-11-29T23:55:50Z

2012-11-27T23:23:58Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg|400px]]
-For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench.  We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models.  We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.
+For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench.  We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models.
 == Group Members ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 14 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg\|400px]]		[[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg\|400px]]
		+
	For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench. We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models. We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.		For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench. We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models. We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg|600px]]
+[[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg|400px]]
-−
 For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench.  We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models.  We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.
 == Group Members ==
 John Pfalzer <br/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 14 December 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly ==		== Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly ==
	[[Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly - Group 6 2012\| Gate 4 ]] discusses the mechanisms of the impact wrench. It also goes through the reassembly of the wrench and discusses possible design revisions.		[[Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly - Group 6 2012\| Gate 4 ]] discusses the mechanisms of the impact wrench. It also goes through the reassembly of the wrench and discusses possible design revisions.
		+
		+	== Gate 5 - Delivery ==
		+	[[Gate 5 - Delivery - Group 6 2012\| Gate 5 ]] contains a summary of the product and the project. It goes through what the group did through each gate. This page contains links to all the other pages and should be viewed as the technical report.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg|600px]]
 For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench.  We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models.  We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.
 == Group Members ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 29 November 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Gate 3 - Product Overview and Analysis - Group 6 2012\| Gate 3 ]] is where the group did further analysis on the dissected impact wrench.		[[Gate 3 - Product Overview and Analysis - Group 6 2012\| Gate 3 ]] is where the group did further analysis on the dissected impact wrench.

−	== Gate 4 ==	+	== Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly ==
		+	[[Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly - Group 6 2012\| Gate 4 ]] discusses the mechanisms of the impact wrench. It also goes through the reassembly of the wrench and discusses possible design revisions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 27 November 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:

	== Gate 4 ==		== Gate 4 ==
−
−	~~<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/7HdY5DhO7BE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>~~