Group 6 - Kobalt 1/2 in Impact Wrench
(Created page with "Kobalt 1/2" Impact Wrench == Group Members == John Pfalzer<br/> Amie Vuong<br/> Kyle Schmidt<br/> Michael Wrona<br/> Spencer Heyden<br/>") |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:IWFRONTWrench.jpg|400px]] |
| + | |||
| + | For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench. We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool. | ||
== Group Members == | == Group Members == | ||
| − | John Pfalzer<br/> | + | John Pfalzer <br/> |
| − | Amie Vuong<br/> | + | Amie Vuong <br/> |
| − | Kyle Schmidt<br/> | + | Kyle Schmidt <br/> |
| − | Michael Wrona<br/> | + | Michael Wrona <br/> |
| − | Spencer Heyden<br/> | + | Spencer Heyden <br/> |
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 1 - Project Planning == | ||
| + | [[Gate 1 - Group 6 2012| Gate 1 ]] is the planning phase for the project. It contains a management proposal and the product archaeology. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 2 - Project Dissection == | ||
| + | [[Gate 2 - Group 6 2012| Gate 2 ]] is where the group took the impact wrench apart. It contains challenges faced and product archaeology | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 3 - Product Analysis == | ||
| + | [[Gate 3 - Product Overview and Analysis - Group 6 2012| Gate 3 ]] is where the group did further analysis on the dissected impact wrench. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly == | ||
| + | [[Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly - Group 6 2012| Gate 4 ]] discusses the mechanisms of the impact wrench. It also goes through the reassembly of the wrench and discusses possible design revisions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 5 - Delivery == | ||
| + | [[Gate 5 - Delivery - Group 6 2012| Gate 5 ]] contains a summary of the product and the project. It goes through what the group did through each gate. This page contains links to all the other pages and should be viewed as the technical report. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 13 December 2012
For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench. We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models.
We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.
Contents |
Group Members
John Pfalzer
Amie Vuong
Kyle Schmidt
Michael Wrona
Spencer Heyden
Gate 1 - Project Planning
Gate 1 is the planning phase for the project. It contains a management proposal and the product archaeology.
Gate 2 - Project Dissection
Gate 2 is where the group took the impact wrench apart. It contains challenges faced and product archaeology
Gate 3 - Product Analysis
Gate 3 is where the group did further analysis on the dissected impact wrench.
Gate 4 - Product Explanation and Reassembly
Gate 4 discusses the mechanisms of the impact wrench. It also goes through the reassembly of the wrench and discusses possible design revisions.
Gate 5 - Delivery
Gate 5 contains a summary of the product and the project. It goes through what the group did through each gate. This page contains links to all the other pages and should be viewed as the technical report.
