Group 6 - Kobalt 1/2 in Impact Wrench
From GICLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Gate 1 - Project Planning == | == Gate 1 - Project Planning == | ||
| − | [[Gate 1 - Group 6 2012| Gate 1 ]] is the planning phase for the project. It contains a management proposal and the product | + | [[Gate 1 - Group 6 2012| Gate 1 ]] is the planning phase for the project. It contains a management proposal and the product archaeology. |
| + | |||
| + | == Gate 2 - Project Dissection == | ||
| + | [[Gate 2 - Group 6 2012| Gate 2 ]] is where the group took the impact wrench apart. It contains challenges faced and product archaeology | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 25 October 2012
Kobalt 1/2" Impact Wrench
For our dissection we chose a Kobalt 1/2" pneumatic impact wrench. We chose a pneumatic wrench rather than an electric wrench because we were interested in the differences in efficiencies between the models. We will look at how the design was influenced by various factors and will examine the overall complexity of the tool.
Group Members
John Pfalzer
Amie Vuong
Kyle Schmidt
Michael Wrona
Spencer Heyden
Gate 1 - Project Planning
Gate 1 is the planning phase for the project. It contains a management proposal and the product archaeology.
Gate 2 - Project Dissection
Gate 2 is where the group took the impact wrench apart. It contains challenges faced and product archaeology
