Group 2 - Honda Generator 2
From GICLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Gate 3: Product Analysis) |
(→Executive Summary) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Introduction= | =Introduction= | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Executive Summary== | ||
| + | |||
| + | To the Grader: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Group 2 has successfully completed the project along with its respective gates in its entirety. We enjoyed this project and learned more than we thought we would have. Below are some key findings and processes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I. Complexity – When we were first told that we would have to disassemble and reassemble a generator for our project, we were scared. The fact that our product was so much more complex than other distributed products had us worried so much as to a point where we felt cheated. We thought that it was unfair that our product was so harder than everyone else’s. However as we progressed through the gates we learned more and more about our product and found that we learned so much in a short period of time. Looking back, we are glad that we got the generator as a product because not only did we learn more about the product itself, but we also learned more about four-stroke engines in general. We are proud of our work and are proud of all of the knowledge we have acquired. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::II. Disassembly and Reassembly – When going through these processes we found that the reassembly was surprisingly easier than we thought. This could be because of the fact that we were blind when trying to disassemble the generator. When disassembling the generator we took so many pictures to help aid in the reassembly process later on. However, when we went to reassemble the generator we did not use a single photo to help us reassemble it. We all learned exactly how the generator worked and how each of its components worked after we disassemble it. We all knew exactly how each part worked because of the documentation steps. As we look back, the documentation of the disassembly was probably the most beneficial aspect of this project because it forced us to know our product inside and out. After realizing this and reassembling our product, we now appreciate the layout of each gate and how it forced us to learn. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::III. Cooperation – While working through all the gates our group members started to work together better and better. After each of us fell into our respective roles we were able to work efficiently and successfully together. Each group member contributed so much in order to ensure the completion of our project and we are all very proud of each other. We were able to experience what real world engineers do: work collectively to finish a job. By keeping a professional yet friendly atmosphere, we felt like engineers in the professional field working for a company. We realized the importance of a good team and the difference that it makes. | ||
==Product Overview== | ==Product Overview== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 45: | ||
:Initial Assessment | :Initial Assessment | ||
| − | [[Request for Proposal | + | |
| + | [[Request for Proposal]] | ||
==Gate 2: Product Dissection== | ==Gate 2: Product Dissection== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 52: | ||
The link below navigates to the <u>Gate 2: Product Dissection</u> page which includes: | The link below navigates to the <u>Gate 2: Product Dissection</u> page which includes: | ||
| − | : | + | :Preliminary Project Review |
| − | : | + | :Product Dissection |
| − | |||
[[Product Dissection]] | [[Product Dissection]] | ||
| Line 49: | Line 61: | ||
==Gate 3: Product Analysis== | ==Gate 3: Product Analysis== | ||
| − | The link below navigates to the <u>Gate | + | The link below navigates to the <u>Gate 3: Product Analysis</u> page which includes: |
| − | : | + | :Coordination Review |
| − | : | + | :Product Evaluation |
| − | |||
[[Product Analysis]] | [[Product Analysis]] | ||
| Line 61: | Line 72: | ||
==Gate 4: Product Explanation== | ==Gate 4: Product Explanation== | ||
| + | The link below navigates to the <u>Gate 4: Product Explanation</u> page which includes: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Critical Project Review | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Product Explanation | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Product Explanation]] | ||
==Gate 5: Documentation and Delivery== | ==Gate 5: Documentation and Delivery== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The link below navigates to the <u>Gate 5: Documentation and Delivery</u> page which includes: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Delivery | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Documentation | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Documentation and Delivery]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 18 December 2010
Contents |
Introduction
Executive Summary
To the Grader:
- Group 2 has successfully completed the project along with its respective gates in its entirety. We enjoyed this project and learned more than we thought we would have. Below are some key findings and processes.
- I. Complexity – When we were first told that we would have to disassemble and reassemble a generator for our project, we were scared. The fact that our product was so much more complex than other distributed products had us worried so much as to a point where we felt cheated. We thought that it was unfair that our product was so harder than everyone else’s. However as we progressed through the gates we learned more and more about our product and found that we learned so much in a short period of time. Looking back, we are glad that we got the generator as a product because not only did we learn more about the product itself, but we also learned more about four-stroke engines in general. We are proud of our work and are proud of all of the knowledge we have acquired.
- II. Disassembly and Reassembly – When going through these processes we found that the reassembly was surprisingly easier than we thought. This could be because of the fact that we were blind when trying to disassemble the generator. When disassembling the generator we took so many pictures to help aid in the reassembly process later on. However, when we went to reassemble the generator we did not use a single photo to help us reassemble it. We all learned exactly how the generator worked and how each of its components worked after we disassemble it. We all knew exactly how each part worked because of the documentation steps. As we look back, the documentation of the disassembly was probably the most beneficial aspect of this project because it forced us to know our product inside and out. After realizing this and reassembling our product, we now appreciate the layout of each gate and how it forced us to learn.
- III. Cooperation – While working through all the gates our group members started to work together better and better. After each of us fell into our respective roles we were able to work efficiently and successfully together. Each group member contributed so much in order to ensure the completion of our project and we are all very proud of each other. We were able to experience what real world engineers do: work collectively to finish a job. By keeping a professional yet friendly atmosphere, we felt like engineers in the professional field working for a company. We realized the importance of a good team and the difference that it makes.
Product Overview
The 7000 Watt Honeywell generator, powered by Honda, was designed to give the consumer a portable, gas powered form of power that can be used on many different tools and appliances. This product was provided to the public to use in areas or situations where power is not available, whether it be away from home or during a power outage. The generator is easy to use and comes with an easy start-up guide.
Team Overview
Given the task of analyzing a Honda Generator, our team divided the work evenly and each member was given a specific role:
- Eric Wettlaufer: Chief Dissector and Parts Technician
- Nick Marucci: Work Manager and Assistant Dissector/Reassembler
- Mary Kate Baker: Head Documenter and Website Developer
- Joseph Robison: Chief Editor and Technical Writer and Assistant Dissector/Re-assembler
- John Vinti: Project Manager
Project Gates
Gate 1: Request For Proposal
The link below navigates to the Gate 1: Request For Proposal page which includes:
- Work Proposal
- Management Proposal
- Initial Assessment
Gate 2: Product Dissection
The link below navigates to the Gate 2: Product Dissection page which includes:
- Preliminary Project Review
- Product Dissection
Gate 3: Product Analysis
The link below navigates to the Gate 3: Product Analysis page which includes:
- Coordination Review
- Product Evaluation
Gate 4: Product Explanation
The link below navigates to the Gate 4: Product Explanation page which includes:
- Critical Project Review
- Product Explanation
Gate 5: Documentation and Delivery
The link below navigates to the Gate 5: Documentation and Delivery page which includes:
- Delivery
- Documentation
