Group 23 - Daiwa Baitcast Reel (Right Hand Retrieve)

From GICLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gate 4)
(Gate 4)
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 127: Line 127:
 
==Gate 4==
 
==Gate 4==
  
This is the final gate that deals with the analysis of the product. The re-assembly process was introduced, provided by a step-by-step documentation. Also, a few key mechanisms were identified and three possible system revisions were suggested. The gate included:
+
This is the final gate that deals with the analysis of the product. The re-assembly process was introduced, provided by a step-by-step documentation. Also, the key mechanism was identified and three possible system revisions were suggested. The gate included:
 
*Project Management
 
*Project Management
 
*Product Archeology and Re-assembly
 
*Product Archeology and Re-assembly
  
 
[[Gate 4: Product Reassembly]]
 
[[Gate 4: Product Reassembly]]

Revision as of 17:07, 30 November 2012

Contents

Members

Md. Fahad Hossain
MDFahadH.jpeg
Role: Project Manager
E-mail: mdfahadh@buffalo.edu
Connor McCafferty
CMC.jpeg
Role: Co-Project Manager
E-mail: cmccaffe@buffalo.edu
Paul Tabellion
PaulT.jpeg
Role: Photo Editor
E-mail: paulfabi@buffalo.edu
Mike Persic
MikeP.jpeg
Role: Schedule Manager
E-mail: mjpersic@buffalo.edu
Kevin Dailey
KevinD.jpeg
Role: Technical Expert
E-mail: kevindai@buffalo.edu




























Project Overview

Over the course of this semester, team 23 disassembled and re-assembled a Daiwa Baitcast Reel (Right Hand Retrieve). The main objective of this project was to carefully, analyze the reel, which includes the documentation of the internal parts so that any individual, regardless of prior experience, may also take it apart with ease. We also looked into its internal workings and all the mechanisms that are involved when the product is being used out in the field. The whole project was thus divided into Gates, each dealing with a level of the project. Lastly, after each assessment of our Gates, we attempted amending the Gates to better suite the needs of the instructors.


Gate 1

This gate mainly dealt with the overall planning of the project. Furthermore, the products initial assessment was made without any attempt to disassemble it. This gate includes:

  • Work Proposal
  • Management Proposal
  • Product Archeology

Gate 1: Work and Management Proposal, Product Archeology


Gate 2

This gate dealt with the first practical work involved with the project, that is, the taking apart of the product along with its documentation. The subsystems were recognized and pictorial representation was used to help understand the step-by-step disassembly process. Also, the initial planning of the project was revised. This gate included:

  • Revision of Initial Planning
  • Product Dissection

Gate 2: Dissection of the Reel

Gate 3

This gate includes the in-depth analysis of the product, its subsystems; how they were manufactured and their specifications. Furthermore, design revisions and four factors were taken into consideration as well, and lastly, includes CAD drawings for some of the subsystems.

  • Project Management
  • Product Archeology and Assessment

Gate 3: Product Assessment and In-depth Analysis


Gate 4

This is the final gate that deals with the analysis of the product. The re-assembly process was introduced, provided by a step-by-step documentation. Also, the key mechanism was identified and three possible system revisions were suggested. The gate included:

  • Project Management
  • Product Archeology and Re-assembly

Gate 4: Product Reassembly

Personal tools