Group 1 2012 Gate 3

From GICLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_1.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
BLAH BLAH BLAH, hamfisted reiteration of what the assignment is in a shallow and soulless attempt to scrape a few more percentage points out of the bottom of the barrel where they keep our failing grades.  
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_2.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
 
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_3.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
== Project Management ==
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_4.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
===Cause for Corrective Action===
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_5.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
The group seems to be working together well now. we generally have very regular attendance at meetings and are improving our focus during those meetings. The cause for concern now is more refining our approach to group assignments that they may be completed as quickly and efficiently as possible. To that end, everyone was specifically assigned tasks before our first meeting in an attempt to streamline group work, and also to attempt to more evenly distribute out of meeting work among members.  
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_6.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
 
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_7.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
== Project Evaluation ==
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_8.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
=== Component Summary ===
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_9.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
{|
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_10.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|Component Name
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_11.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|Component Picture
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_12.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|Material(s)
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_13.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|Number of Components
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_14.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_15.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|-
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_16.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|Keys
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_17.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|asfdff
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_18.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|wood, with plastic covering
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_19.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|152
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_20.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
|In this section should be a bunch of stuff discussing the component's purpose and manufacturing techniques involved in its prodocution
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_21.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
 
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_22.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
=== Product Analysis===
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_23.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
we have to answer all these questions:  
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_24.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
Component Function
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_25.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
What function does the component perform?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_26.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
Does the component help to perform multiple functions?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_27.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
What flows are associated with the component?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_28.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
What environment does the component function in?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_29.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
Component Form (Geometry, Material, and Appearance)
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_30.jpeg|200px|caption caption caption]]
+
What is the general shape of the component?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_31.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
Does it have any notable properties (e.g. axis-symetric)?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_32.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
Is it primarily one, two, or three dimensional?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_33.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
How large is the component (L x W x H)?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_34.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
How is the component’s shape coupled to the function the component performs?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_35.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
What does the component (roughly) weigh?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_36.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
What material is the component made from?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_37.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
Did manufacturing decisions impact this?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_38.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
Is a specific material property needed for it to function?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_39.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
How did global, societal, economic, and environmental factors influence the decision?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_40.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
What are the aesthetic properties of the component?
−
[[File:2012_Group_1_Picture_41.jpeg|thumb|100px|caption caption caption]]
+
Does the component have an aesthetic purpose?
 +
What color is the component and why?
 +
What type of surface finish does the component have?
 +
Is this for functional or aesthetic reasons?
 +
Manufacturing Methods
 +
What manufacturing methods were used to make the part?
 +
What evidence supports this?
 +
Did material choice impact this decision?
 +
Did shape impact the method selected?
 +
How did global, societal, economic, and environmental factors influence the decision?
 +
Component Complexity
 +
How complex is each component?
 +
Define a meaningful scale?
 +
How do the three categories above impact complexity?
 +
How complex are the interactions?
 +
How can you define a meaningful scale?
 +
 
 +
For '''at least''' seven components. SEVEN.  
 +
God I hate this class.  
 +
 
 +
=== Solid Modeled Assembly ===
 +
 
 +
=== Engineering Analysis ===
 +
 
 +
=== Design Revisions ===
 +
In this section, we get to think about changes to a system that has been optimized over hundreds of years!
 +
While also considering one of the four bullshit GSEE factors, and the "products[sic] target audience and price point when making changes".
 +
 
 +
I can't decide if we're suppose to make or climb the mountain of bullshit.

Revision as of 21:10, 30 October 2012

BLAH BLAH BLAH, hamfisted reiteration of what the assignment is in a shallow and soulless attempt to scrape a few more percentage points out of the bottom of the barrel where they keep our failing grades.

Contents

Project Management

Cause for Corrective Action

The group seems to be working together well now. we generally have very regular attendance at meetings and are improving our focus during those meetings. The cause for concern now is more refining our approach to group assignments that they may be completed as quickly and efficiently as possible. To that end, everyone was specifically assigned tasks before our first meeting in an attempt to streamline group work, and also to attempt to more evenly distribute out of meeting work among members.

Project Evaluation

Component Summary

Component Name Component Picture Material(s) Number of Components
Keys asfdff wood, with plastic covering 152 In this section should be a bunch of stuff discussing the component's purpose and manufacturing techniques involved in its prodocution

Product Analysis

we have to answer all these questions: Component Function What function does the component perform? Does the component help to perform multiple functions? What flows are associated with the component? What environment does the component function in? Component Form (Geometry, Material, and Appearance) What is the general shape of the component? Does it have any notable properties (e.g. axis-symetric)? Is it primarily one, two, or three dimensional? How large is the component (L x W x H)? How is the component’s shape coupled to the function the component performs? What does the component (roughly) weigh? What material is the component made from? Did manufacturing decisions impact this? Is a specific material property needed for it to function? How did global, societal, economic, and environmental factors influence the decision? What are the aesthetic properties of the component? Does the component have an aesthetic purpose? What color is the component and why? What type of surface finish does the component have? Is this for functional or aesthetic reasons? Manufacturing Methods What manufacturing methods were used to make the part? What evidence supports this? Did material choice impact this decision? Did shape impact the method selected? How did global, societal, economic, and environmental factors influence the decision? Component Complexity How complex is each component? Define a meaningful scale? How do the three categories above impact complexity? How complex are the interactions? How can you define a meaningful scale?

For at least seven components. SEVEN. God I hate this class.

Solid Modeled Assembly

Engineering Analysis

Design Revisions

In this section, we get to think about changes to a system that has been optimized over hundreds of years! While also considering one of the four bullshit GSEE factors, and the "products[sic] target audience and price point when making changes".

I can't decide if we're suppose to make or climb the mountain of bullshit.

Retrieved from "http://gicl.cs.drexel.edu/wiki-data/index.php?title=Group_1_2012_Gate_3&oldid=184992"
Personal tools