Group 15 - Craftsman Weed Whacker

From GICLWiki
Revision as of 21:27, 9 October 2011 by MAE 277 2011 Group15 (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Gate One: Project Planning and Proposal

Introduction

Before starting on a major project it is important to understand what you are getting yourself into; this particularly important in a group setting. It is very important to know the strengths and weaknesses of each individual so that it is possible to maximize the group’s effectiveness. In this gate of the project we will go over the approach we will take in disassembling and reassembling our product, we will go over what tools we will need to do this, and address our strengths and weaknesses as individuals and a group as a whole.


Management Proposal

Team

Capabilities


Table 1.1 - A short profile of the team members.

Member Strengths Weaknesses Contact Information
Brent Haseley -Experience with tools and machines

-Worked 4 years in warehouse maintenance
- Working knowledge of CAD

-Not CAD expert

-Very busy with overwhelming schedule and workload for other classes
-Used to working on machines in a more casual environment

brenthas@buffalo.edu
Charles Kalbfell -Quick learner

-Proficient writer and editor
-Experience working with weed wackers
-Works well in a group setting

-Not familiar with 3-D modeling

-Poor presentation skills
-Issue with time management

cekalbfe@buffalo.edu
Frances Kalbfell -Good writer

-Willing to work hard
-Looking forward to working on this project
-Some hands-on experience working on weed wackers

-Tendency to wait till the last minute

-Limited experience with AutoCAD
-No prior experience with website design

francesk@buffalo.edu
James Quirk -Proficient in CAD and 3-D modeling

-Good communicator
-Worked in a mechanical engineering field (Power Plant)

-Procrastinator

-I have trouble focusing on one task
-I am not experienced with tools

jaquirk@buffalo.edu
James Ziccarelli -Performs confident work with hands when dealing with a product

- Has great interpersonal and communication with others
- Looks for different learning methods to solve problems
- Good problem solving skills and analyzing problems
- Creative Thinker

- Not totally efficient with AutoCAD or Pro-Engineer

- Busy between school and a part-time job
- Keeping paperwork organized

jdz4@buffalo.edu


Roles


Table 1.2 - A brief description of the roles assigned to each group member.

Member Jobs
Brent Haseley Documenter: I will be responsible for documenting and
photographing every step of the product dissection.

Wiki Designer: I will be the person doing most of the
maintenance and upkeep on the Wiki page.

Charles Kalbfell Project Manager: I will be tasked with setting meeting
dates, internal group deadlines, resolving conflicts,

and keeping the project on track. I will also read over everybody’s
reports before submission. It will be up to me to
assign different portions of the reposts to each member of the group.
Co-Technical Expert: Aiding the main technical expert in any
challenges he is faced with.

Frances Kalbfell Chief Editor: I will be in charge of thoroughly going over
everyone’s parts to make sure that they are technically

and grammatically correct. I will also have to put all of the parts
together in a coherent manner before they are due.
Project Compiler: Another of my jobs will require me to be
responsible for taking all of the collective data and
information and aiding in the management of the group Wiki page.

James Quirk Communication Liaison: I am in charge of communication between
my group members and the instructors. When the group

needs a question answered, I am the person who expresses this via email
to the instructors. If we set dates for meetings or
other group activities, it is my job to enlighten the whole group and
keep them up to date on what is going on.
Technical Drawer: I am in charge of the doing anything involving
CAD or 3-D Modeling. When we figure out the parts during
dissection, it is my job to draw them and present them in a professional
manner. For the final presentation, I will make sure all
of my work fits in with the rest of the group.

James Ziccarelli Main Technical Expert: I am in charge of the actual product dissection.
Will also be responsible for developing a thorough knowledge of the
physical product and understanding how it will be reassembled.

Conflict Management

Meetings

  • For all gates our group has made plans to meet at least one time each week out of class and lab to ensure that we get the gates done ahead of time.
  • Each group member plans on going to the lab at least one time each week.
  • The group also meets briefly at the end of every lecture to discuss progress of the project.



Initial Product Assessment

Disassembly Plan


Table 1.3

Part Description Fastener Tool Required Time (minutes)
Muffler Cover 2 Self-Tapping Screws Phillips Driver 3
Air Filter 2 Machine Screws Allen Wrench 1
Carburetor (from motor) 2 Machine Screws Phillips Driver 2.5
Carburetor (from throttle) 2 Bolts and Nuts Crescent Wrench 2
Spark Plug Ground Friction Hand .5
Engine Cover 8 Machine Screws Allen Wrench 3
Pull Start Coil 4 Machine Screws Allen Wrench 2
Shaft Joint Cover 2 Machine Screws Allen Wrench 1
Hose Clamp 1 Machine Screw Flat Head Driver 1
Trigger and Housing 1 Machine Screw Allen Wrench 1
Forward Hand Grip 1 Screw with Knob Hand 1
Head Guard 2 Self Tapping Screws Flat Head Driver 2
Head Cap Friction Hand .5
Head 1 Machine Screw Phillips Driver .5
Strap Loop 1 Bolt and Nut Crescent Wrench 1
Total Disassembly Time 21 minutes

(All times listed are with the assumption that all the parts are going to come off easily, however we know that this is not the case and the dissection will indeed take longer than the time we have listed.)


Possible Challenges:

  • Several metal components are rusted and may strip easily, delaying our product dissection
  • There have been a few home repairs on this product that may force us to deviate from the disassembly plan that would be used on a new product. Most notably, the rear hand grip and trigger line are held together with a hose clamp.
  • The product was not in a running state before the project began (gas line was cut and the primer was ripped out), so it is highly unlikely that it will run after reassembly unless replacement parts are installed.
  • Due to the restrictions imposed on us for Gate One, we have as yet been unable to inspect the actual engine to determine its condition. A rusted and/or deteriorated engine will hinder dissection


Project Timeline

Table 1.4 - a general timeline of projected project deadlines.

Task Subtasks Stating day Optimal Completion
Gate 1 September 9, 2011 October 10, 2011
Project Management Decisions Work Proposal
Management Proposal
September 12, 2011 September 28, 2011
Project Archeology Preparation and Initial
Assessment Questions
September 30, 2011 October 10, 2011
Gate 2 October 10, 2011 October 26, 2011
Project Management:
Preliminary Review
Cause for Corrective Action October 10, 2011 October 20, 2011
Product Archaeology Physical Dissection October 10, 2011 October 17, 2011
Documentation of Dissection Notes in lab
Written up documentation
October 10, 2011
October 10, 2011
October 17, 2011
October 19, 2011
Gate 3 October 26, 2011 November 14, 2011
Project Management:
Coordinate Review
Cause for Corrective Action October 26, 2011 October 30, 2011
Product Archaeology:
Product Evaluation
Component Summary
Product Analysis
Solid Model Assembly
Engineering Analysis
October 26, 2011
November 1, 2011
October 26, 2011
October 26, 2011
November 3, 2011
November 12, 2011
November 8, 2011
November 10, 2011
Component Assessment Questions November 1, 2011 November 12, 2011
Gate 4 November 14, 2011 December 2, 2011
Project Management:
Critical Project Review
Cause for Corrective Action November 14, 2011 November 18, 2011
Product Archaeology:
Product Explanation
Product Reassembly November 14, 2011 November 18, 2011
Design Revisions November 14, 2011 November 28. 2011
Product Dissection
Assessment Questions
November 14, 2011 November 29, 2011
Gate 5 December 2, 2011 December 16, 2011
Project Management:
Delivery
Finalization of Deliverables
Final Assessment
December 2, 2011
December 2, 2011
December 8, 2011
December 10, 2011
Product Archaeology:
Documentation
Technical Report
Oral Presentation
December 6, 2011
December 2, 2011
December 12, 2011
December 14, 2011
Personal tools