|
|
| (43 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | [[File:model.jpg|500px|thumb|right|Nerf Vortex Pyragon gun]] |
| | + | =Introduction= |
| | + | Our group plans to display the skills required to reverse engineer the Nerf gun Pyragon. The Nerf Vortex Pyragon is a disc shooter that can hold 40 discs in the given drum magazine. |
| | | | |
| − | == Introduction == | + | =Project Summary= |
| − | Our group plans to display the skills required to reverse engineer products.
| + | Throughout the gates, our group dissected, analyzed, and reassembled the product. We looked in depth on how parts interacted with one another on both system and subsystem levels. We also examined how these parts were manufactured. Once we had a good understanding on how our product worked, we proposed some design revisions that our group felt would increase the performance of our gun. When proposing design revisions, took into consideration the four GSEE factors which are global, societal, economical, and environmental. |
| | | | |
| − | == Product ==
| |
| − | The Nerf Vortex Pyragon is a disc shooter that can hold 40 discs in the given drum magazine.
| |
| | | | |
| − | *[[File:model.jpg]]<nowiki>[1]</nowiki> | + | =Gate 1= |
| | + | Project Planning- We planned out how we will work through the project |
| | + | *[[gate1-14]] |
| | | | |
| − | | + | =Gate 2= |
| − | == Gate 1 ==
| + | Product Dissection- Following our plan we dissected our product and documented the dissection |
| − | | + | *[[gate2-14]] |
| − | === Work Proposal ===
| + | =Gate 3= |
| − | The disassembly of our product, Nerf Pyragon, is anticipated to be a unproblematic procedure. The tools we anticipate we will need are a Phillips head screwdriver, flat head screwdriver, and a rubber hammer. The Nerf gun is assembled with mostly Phillips screws so the Phillips head screwdriver will be the most needed tool we use. The flat head screwdriver will be helpful in prying apart the plastic gun and parts inside it. Also, the rubber hammer will be useful to aid in prying apart the plastic parts involved in our Nerf gun product. We predict it will take approximately three hours to dissect our product. This involves taking it apart and analyzing the parts inside of the product. We assumed about an hour for disassembly, an hour for analysis, and an hour to reassemble the gun. There are a few challenges we foresee in the dissection of our product.
| + | Product Analysis- After dissecting our product, we analyzed the components |
| − | | + | *[[gate3-14]] |
| − | === Challenges ===
| + | =Gate 4= |
| − | The clip involved with our Nerf product appears to be the greatest challenge as far as complexity. The disc ammunition is loaded through a top opening into a designated chamber. Once the chamber is full a lever mechanism is used to rotate the chambers so the next one can be filled. This is repeated four times, and as the gun fires it rotates backwards to its original position. This means there are several locking and unlocking mechanisms involved with loading and firing, which means more dis assembly, analysis, and reassembly. The pump on the end of the gun performs several operations with one quick motion. When pumped a disc is chambered to be fired, the spring is compressed, and the trigger is primed. Because of the number of duties performed by this piece of the gun, the pump will require special attention. The trigger is challenging also because it performs more than one task. It simultaneously releases the spring to fire the disc, and readies the next disc to be fired.
| + | Product Explanation- Reassembly of the product and detailed conclusions |
| − | With special attention to the magazine, pump, and trigger our group should be able to overcome the more difficult concepts of the Nerf toy. Each member of our group has their own capabilities to benefit the dissection of our product. Regardless of capabilities, each member also has shortcomings that may affect our work. The table below demonstrates these pros and cons.
| + | *[[gate4-14]] |
| − | *Ryan - Capabilities: Previous experience with Nerf guns, technical writing skills, work with 3D modeling Shortcomings: Bad time management skills | + | |
| − | *Rachel - Capabilities: Good time management skills, leadership ability, communication skills, typing skills Shortcomings: Never owned a Nerf gun
| + | |
| − | *Peter - Capabilities: Previous experience with Nerf guns, had classes in physics and CAD Shortcomings: Hasty
| + | |
| − | *Brenden - Capabilities: Previous experience with Nerf guns, has experience with CAD Shortcomings: Bad time management skills
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Management Proposal === | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | To better manage the project we have assigned roles to each group member to lighten the work load and better organize the task. Rachel has been assigned Project Manager, due to her proficiency in leadership and time management. Peter has taken the Web Expert position, because he has previous experience with web programming. His position will require him to update the wiki when needed and handle other online research tasks. Brenden offered to take the Communication Liaison role, and will be relaying information from the group to the professors and the other way around. Ryan will be filling in the Tech Expert position, and will be revising and working on technical papers throughout the project.
| + | |
| − | *'''Contact Information: Brenden Burry, Comm. Liaison: Email - Brendenb@buffalo.eduPhone - 585-409-9471'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Meeting Information ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Wednesdays at 5pm at group study area in the library.
| + | |
| − | Sundays may be used as optional meeting times should we need more time or unseen complications arise.
| + | |
| − | The following weekly schedule puts the group ahead of the current schedule, which means we can be better prepared for any emergency events that may come up during the course of the project.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Weekly Schedule ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | *Week one (Oct 7 - Oct 13):
| + | |
| − | Gate 2 - Dissection/Analysis
| + | |
| − | *Week two (Oct 14 - Oct 20):
| + | |
| − | Gate 2 - Corrective Action Review
| + | |
| − | *Week three (Oct 21 - Oct 27):
| + | |
| − | Gate 3 -Analyze Info/Test
| + | |
| − | *Week four (Oct 28 - Nov 3):
| + | |
| − | Gate 3 - Second Corrective Action Review
| + | |
| − | *Week five (Nov 4 - Nov 10):
| + | |
| − | Gate 4 - Conclusions
| + | |
| − | *Week six (Nov 11 - Nov 17):
| + | |
| − | Gate 4 - Final Corrective Action Review
| + | |
| − | *Week seven (Nov 18 - Nov 24):
| + | |
| − | Thanksgiving
| + | |
| − | *Week eight (Nov 25 - Dec 1):
| + | |
| − | Gate 5 - Documentation and preparation
| + | |
| − | *Week nine (Dec 2 - Dec 8):
| + | |
| − | Gate 5 - Finalize and Submit
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Product Archaeology ===
| + | |
| − | In our initial assessment of our product, we familiarized ourselves with the product. This allowed us to gather information regarding our product to successfully complete our dissection. Our product was developed in the beginning of the year 2012. Key economic concerns were the price so it could be made into a cheap toy for the poor economy. Key global concerns were the safety of the product since it has real gun like features. The product was planned to be sold in North America and the UK. The toy is designed for the safe enjoyment for kids ages 8 and older. The Nerf gun is intended to be used at home and helps give young kids a fun and safe toy to play with.
| + | |
| − | While being a children’s toy, the Nerf gun has some complexities. It uses mechanical work to turn potential spring energy into kinetic energy. The components consist of a clip, clip mechanisms, trigger, pump, jam release. Also this product has a complicated camber to hold the foam discs. The interactions between the components themselves are not too complex. It is made up of mostly plastic, with some metals screws and 40 foam discs. We believe that there are also metal springs inside the product.
| + | |
| − | The complexity of this product makes it more enjoyable to play with. The simplicity of using the toy makes it easy for most users to pick it up and perform with it, often with very little previous knowledge about the product. The design is as intuitive as load, pump, and shoot. Since the design itself is simple, and most of the material being made of plastic, the Nerf weapon requires little to no maintenance throughout the course of its lifetime. Many of Nerf’s other products function in a similar fashion. Some guns offer advantages such as auto fire, while others have disadvantages such as smaller clip sizes. The price difference between products can vary depending on the complexity of toy, where the most complex Nerf gun is upwards of 150 dollars, and the simplest as low as four.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Gate 2 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Purpose ===
| + | |
| − | === Cause For Corrosive Action ===
| + | |
| − | During our dissection, we attempted to follow our work and management plans. Our plans however did not work out perfectly. The tools we anticipated using were accurate, but the time we anticipated was very inaccurate. We stated, “We assume about an hour for disassembly, an hour for analysis, and an hour to reassemble the gun.” It was correct that it took approximately only an hour for disassembly but to analysis everything took far longer. We had to really look into our product to figure out what parts preformed certain functions. Some parts sprung out and we had trouble finding where it sprung from and the direction that it went into our product. We spent a lot of time trying to put parts back in different directions until we got it back the correct way. Once we figured out how all the parts went into our product, we made conclusions on how those parts work to make our product preform the desired function. Our management plans are going as planned and helps everyone to know their role for the project. Rachel fulfills her duties to organize meetings, Peter keeps the wiki up to date, Brenden provides the group with needed information, and Ryan overlooks the group work.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Dissection of Product ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | {| style="color:blue; background-color:#ffffcc;" cellpadding="10" class="wikitable"
| + | |
| − | |Step
| + | |
| − | |Description
| + | |
| − | |Image
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |1
| + | |
| − | |Take the drum clip apart from the nerf gun by pressing the orange lever, located above the trigger, and pulling the drum out of it's place in the gun.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Hands
| + | |
| − | This step is intended by by manufacturer in order to provide a system to load the gun.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:IMAG0348.jpg|500px]][[File:Nerf-frame.jpeg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |2
| + | |
| − | |There are 5 screws (indicated by the orange boxes) in the cocking mechanism. By taking the screws out of the cocking mechanism and taking the cocking mechanism off of the frame, you can take off the rear cap (indicated by the green box), take out the 11 screws on the frame (indicated by the blue boxes) and separate the frames into two parts.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of cap, frame and cocking mechanism)
| + | |
| − | It is possible that the manufacturer might have enabled the easy removal of the cocking mechanism and frame in order for a consumer to customize the gun, such as coloring it, but it looks like the screws are the cheapest alternative to connecting the frames.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:0354.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |3
| + | |
| − | |You will now have two parts of a frame. The trigger components (indicated by the green box in picture A)are held together by 4 screws (indicated by the blue boxes in picture B) and a spring (indicated by the yellow bow in picture B). By taking out the screws and the springs, you can take out all the trigger components.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of trigger components)
| + | |
| − | The manufacturer did not intent for the components to be removed. The components were set to fit into the frame upon the connecting of the two frames and the trigger was just resting on the components. This is why it was so easy to remove.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:01.jpg.jpg|500px]][[File:02.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |4
| + | |
| − | |You know can see two main components of the gun, the coil (in picture A) and the chamber (in picture B).
| + | |
| − | |A)[[File:03.jpg|500px]]B)[[File:04.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |5
| + | |
| − | |After close observation and awkward placement of a screwdriver, it is possible to remove the chamber from the gun. Now you can see how the chamber and it's components work together and how they connect to the rest of the gun.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Hard
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of chamber)
| + | |
| − | This step was extremely difficult because of the location of the chamber inside the barrel, which is glued, and the awkward placement of the screws. The chamber and coil are not meant to be removed from the frame.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:d1.jpg|500px]][[File:d2.jpg|250px]][[File:d3.jpg|250px]][[File:d4.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |6
| + | |
| − | |To take apart the drum, take out the 6 screws on the top of the drum (indicated by the white boxes and arrow) and remove the orange stem and black cap. Upon removing the orange stem, a spring and orange cap will be released. Take out the 4 screws on the bottom cover (indicate by the white boxes in picture B) and remove the bottom cover
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of stem and caps)
| + | |
| − | The removal of the stem and cap was not intended. Many parts of the stem had to fit into the drum so precisely in order for the drum to function correctly.
| + | |
| − | |A)[[File:06.jpg|500px]]B)[[File:07.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |7
| + | |
| − | |Now you can see the components that make up the trigger for the reloading mechanism. Taking off the spring (indicated by the yellow box) lets the reloading trigger (indicated by the purple box) free. You can now take the trigger, spring, and rod (indicated by the blue box) off. Now, take out the 6 screws (indicated by the white boxes) and take off the black lid.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of trigger, springs and rod)
| + | |
| − | Removal of the springs and components of the reloding mechanism was easy, but very difficult to put back together because of the complexity of the placement of the simple components in order for the drum to be reloaded properly.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:05.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |8
| + | |
| − | |You should not have the components shown in pictures A and B.
| + | |
| − | |A)[[File:1802.jpg|500px]]B)[[File:1810.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |9
| + | |
| − | |By taking out the 4 screws (indicated by the white boxes) on the orange lid, you will release the 3 other springs and spring caps. Your result should like look picture B.
| + | |
| − | Difficulty: Easy
| + | |
| − | Tools used: Screw driver (screws), hands (removal of lid, springs and caps)
| + | |
| − | This process of removing the springs was simple due to the fact that the springs were only held by the lid and topped off by the cap. I do not believe the manufacturers intended for this to be neccessary because of all of the pieces you needed to take apart in order to get to this step.
| + | |
| − | |A)[[File:08.jpg|500px]]B)[[File:1813.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |10
| + | |
| − | |Once you remove the springs, you have an empty barrel and you can see the design that is intended to keep the disc bullets in place.
| + | |
| − | |[[File:400.jpg|500px]][[File:1814.jpg|500px]]
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | |}
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Conclusions ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Citation ==
| + | |
| − | <nowiki>[1]</nowiki> Image take from http://www.hasbro.com/nerf/en_US/shop/details.cfm?R=CC2F6285-5056-900B-10DF-80AF182AF29E:en_US
| + | |
Our group plans to display the skills required to reverse engineer the Nerf gun Pyragon. The Nerf Vortex Pyragon is a disc shooter that can hold 40 discs in the given drum magazine.
Throughout the gates, our group dissected, analyzed, and reassembled the product. We looked in depth on how parts interacted with one another on both system and subsystem levels. We also examined how these parts were manufactured. Once we had a good understanding on how our product worked, we proposed some design revisions that our group felt would increase the performance of our gun. When proposing design revisions, took into consideration the four GSEE factors which are global, societal, economical, and environmental.
Product Dissection- Following our plan we dissected our product and documented the dissection