Gate 3 - Product Analysis (Group 10)

From GICLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
== Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation ==
 
== Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation ==
 +
{|border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Rating'''
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Details'''
 +
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Time'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Component Summary'''||
 +
*Very simple and intuitive.
 +
*Requires basic use of one tool or no tools at all.
 +
*Part meant to be easily removed for basic consumer use maintenance
 +
||Less than a minute
 +
|-
 +
|'''Product Analysis'''||
 +
*Easy.
 +
*Requires basic use of one or more tools.
 +
*Part meant to be removed
 +
||Several minutes
 +
|-
 +
|'''Solid Modeled Assembly'''||
 +
*Moderate level of difficulty.
 +
*Requires use of several tools.
 +
*May require some prior. Experience/knowledge of dealing with tools.
 +
*Part meant to be removed for simple repairs.
 +
||10-20 minutes
 +
|-
 +
|'''Engineering Analysis'''||
 +
*Difficult.
 +
*Requires use of multiple tools.
 +
*May require more advanced methods of removal.
 +
*Part not meant to be taken apart unless for repair.
 +
||20-30 minutes
 +
|-
 +
|'''Design Revisions'''||
 +
*Very difficult.
 +
*Requires use of multiple tools including power tools.
 +
*May require creative/unorthodox methods of removal.
 +
*Part not meant to be taken apart. Part may be damaged or rusted.
 +
||30 minutes +
 +
|-
 +
|}

Revision as of 15:16, 15 November 2012

The goal of this gate of the project is to complete a detailed analysis of our Snow Blower. In this stage we examined the product at the component and subsystem level, gathering and analyzing detailed information, past what we did in the previous two gates. This proses entailed the revision of our parts list form gate two to include the manufacturing processes used to create each part as well as applicable part numbers on the parts. Also we analyzed some parts in more depth creating solid models and also suggested design revisions which could be made to our product.


Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation

Rating Details Time
Component Summary
  • Very simple and intuitive.
  • Requires basic use of one tool or no tools at all.
  • Part meant to be easily removed for basic consumer use maintenance
Less than a minute
Product Analysis
  • Easy.
  • Requires basic use of one or more tools.
  • Part meant to be removed
Several minutes
Solid Modeled Assembly
  • Moderate level of difficulty.
  • Requires use of several tools.
  • May require some prior. Experience/knowledge of dealing with tools.
  • Part meant to be removed for simple repairs.
10-20 minutes
Engineering Analysis
  • Difficult.
  • Requires use of multiple tools.
  • May require more advanced methods of removal.
  • Part not meant to be taken apart unless for repair.
20-30 minutes
Design Revisions
  • Very difficult.
  • Requires use of multiple tools including power tools.
  • May require creative/unorthodox methods of removal.
  • Part not meant to be taken apart. Part may be damaged or rusted.
30 minutes +
Retrieved from "http://gicl.cs.drexel.edu/wiki-data/index.php?title=Gate_3_-_Product_Analysis_(Group_10)&oldid=186645"
Personal tools