Drill Examination
(→Solid Modeled Assembly) |
(→Solid Modeled Assembly) |
||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
===Solid Modeled Assembly=== | ===Solid Modeled Assembly=== | ||
| − | The reasons for choosing these three components are because they are one of if not the most important components that the drill uses to perform its function. These three gears form one gear assembly which is used | + | The reasons for choosing these three components are because they are one of if not the most important components that the drill uses to perform its function. These three gears form one gear assembly which is used and appears three times in the drill in conjunction with each other and the motor of the drill. The motor of the drill spins these sets of gears depending on which torque setting is selected and this makes these three components vital in the operation of the drill. |
We used AutoDesk Inventor for our CAD package. The reason we chose this is because one of our group members has a fair amount of experience in Inventor. He took classes three separate years in high school and has a good understanding of how Inventor works. | We used AutoDesk Inventor for our CAD package. The reason we chose this is because one of our group members has a fair amount of experience in Inventor. He took classes three separate years in high school and has a good understanding of how Inventor works. | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 15 November 2012
Click here to return to main page.
Contents |
Gate 3: Product Examination
Purpose:
With the product dissected, you can now complete a detailed analysis of it. In this stage you will examine the product at the component and subsystem level, gathering detailed information. Present the information in your technical report on your wiki page. Project Management: Coordination Review
Cause for Corrective Action
The group should now be working together well. For unresolved challenges propose how your group is going to address these problems. For challenges that have been addressed describe how your group dealt with the problems. Be very specific in all cases. Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation
Component Summary
Product Analysis
Analyze the engineering decisions that were made during the design of the product, considering the questions in Table 1 at a minimum for seven or more components. These components should be important to the user’s experience, product functionality, product failure, etc.; components which are heavily influenced by one or more GSEE factors are also good candidates for analysis. Justification of your component selection should be provided in the component’s introduction. You should reflect on the information gathered in the previous stages (e.g., the development profile) to help inform your analysis.
Solid Modeled Assembly
The reasons for choosing these three components are because they are one of if not the most important components that the drill uses to perform its function. These three gears form one gear assembly which is used and appears three times in the drill in conjunction with each other and the motor of the drill. The motor of the drill spins these sets of gears depending on which torque setting is selected and this makes these three components vital in the operation of the drill.
We used AutoDesk Inventor for our CAD package. The reason we chose this is because one of our group members has a fair amount of experience in Inventor. He took classes three separate years in high school and has a good understanding of how Inventor works.
Your group should provide solid models of 3-5 individual components using the CAD package of your choice. These components should physically interact, and you must provide an assembly drawing that represents the interaction. Briefly explain your choice of components and CAD package; in this explanation, you may wish to consider previous work.
Engineering Analysis
Choose a key component or function and explain how engineering analysis would be used in the design or testing stages of the design process. Provide a detailed description including MAE 277: Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Practice Fall 2012 Instructors: Phil Cormier and Andrew Olewnik relevant equations and processes that would allow an engineer to easily perform this analysis. This analysis could also be used to help inform your proposed revisions. Table 1: Component Assessment Questions
Design Revisions
| Design Revision Table | ||||
| Original part/setup | Revision | GSEE reflection | Strengths | Weaknesses |
| Electric Motor (Carbon brushes) |
Brushless Motor | Economic: Fewer charges from battery with more efficient motor Longer lasting motor provides less waste with fewer thrown away drills from broken motors. Environmental: More durable motor and longer lasting power through greater efficiency decreases terrain vulnerability of breaking and running out of power. |
Greater torque Up to 50% less demand on battery less repair because motor lasts longer lighter motor quieter |
cost increase by 15% |
| No cognitive assistance | light and level | Societal: A light and level attached to drill can offer the consumer an innovation that can be seen and advertised as convenient. Environmental: A light can provide convenience in conditions of low light. A level can provide convenience in areas where being level is impertinent such as drilling or screwing upside down. |
Illumination Cognitive assistance |
Uses some battery power in led light Adds an estimated 10% increase in cost |
| Basic NiMH battery | Lithium Battery with life indicator |
Societal: Lithium battery especially with life indicator contributes as a good selling feature Economic: Battery lasts longer and requires fewer charges than original Contributes to fewer thrown away drills from dead batteries. Environmental: Drill can be taken to locations without as much worry about recharging. Life indicator allows consumer to know when he must recharge it, which would provide more versatility of usage. |
Lighter Longer usage Life indicator convenience No memory effect (sustains maximum battery life) Very little loss of charge when not in use compared to NiMH. |
cost increase by 15% |