Difference between revisions of "Gate 3 - Group 15 - 2012"

From GICL Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Calculations)
(Handle)
Line 588: Line 588:
  
 
[[File:Group15F2012_HandleRev.jpeg|400px|]]
 
[[File:Group15F2012_HandleRev.jpeg|400px|]]
:Figure_. Handle Revision Suggestion [1]
+
:Figure 10. Handle Revision Suggestion [1]
  
 
=====Torx Screws=====
 
=====Torx Screws=====

Revision as of 04:05, 16 November 2012

Contents

Introduction

The purpose of the third gate was to complete a detailed analyses of the different parts of the circular saw. The analyses examined the functions of each part of the circular saw and how they were manufactured. In addition, the analysis covered an in dept investigation of the most essential parts of the tool and explained the reasons for their designs. Upon completion of the study, an engineering analyses of the saw blade and numerous suggestions for design revisions was made for the circular saw.

Project Management: Coordination Review

Cause for Corrective Action

Overall, the steps we have taken since the first and second gates have been beneficial to our group’s ability to work well together and manage tasks effectively. In this gate, we decided to split up the tasks amongst ourselves using the points system that was devised in the first gate. This worked well because it ensured that everyone in the group had a work load that was as balanced as possible. We also introduced a due date for every part of the gate to be completed by so that the person compiling all of the parts would have ample time to make changes to the wiki page and edit the group’s work. This worked out much better than the previous gates where the compiler was often forced to deal with group members providing submissions very close to the actual due date of the project.

The only challenge that our group has faced during this gate was that everyone had been on a very busy schedule while studying for exams in all of our courses while trying to complete this gate, however we have worked around this by putting enough work into each part every day so that they could be completed by our predetermined due date without having to do all of the work for them at once. The next challenge that our group will face will be managing the work for gate 4 while everyone is home during the fall recess. Since the next gate will be due the following week after we return, we will need to divide up all of the work and set a predetermined due date ahead of time so that group members can work on their parts at home.

Product Archaeology: Product Evaluation

Component Summary

Part Name Quantity # of Times Used Function Materials Reason for Material Manufacturing Process Reason for Manufacturing Process Picture
Motor Housing 1 1 Provides a rigid body and shell that contains and protects the inner mechanisms. Gives the product its main shape.

Most components are connected to it in some way for stability and support. It must also be aesthetically pleasing.

Thermodynamic Plastic Light weight, durable, and cheap Injection Molding Easy and economical way to mass produce this component. Group15F2012 MotorHousing.jpeg
Exhaust Cover 1 1 Prevents larger debris from entering the back of the saw and adds some additional safety (prevents hands from entering).

Designed so air can flow through.

ABS Plastic Light weight, durable, and cheap. Injection Molding Easy and economical way to mass produce this component. Group15F2012 Exhaust.jpeg
120V Field 1 1 Works in conjunction with the 120V armature to convert the electric energy input into rotational energy that is utilized by the saw blade. Steel and copper (wire) Plastic for its cost and ease of alteration and the wire for its conductivity. Wire is first drawn, and plastic is injection molded. Guided winding process to combine the two. Cost and time efficient process Group15F2012 120Field.jpeg
120V Armature 1 1 Works in conjunction with the 120V field to convert the electric energy input into rotational energy that is utilized by the saw blade. Steel, rubber, copper Steel for its durability, copper wire for its conductivity, and rubber for its unique properties. Steel lathed down and machined to introduce the ridges on sides. Wires were extruded and balled into a sphere using a guided winding process Cost effective and efficient for the complexity of the part and to get the desired properties. Group15F2012 120Armature.jpeg
Trigger 1 1 Acts as a switch that permits electrical energy to flow into the motor and allows the saw to operate. It is the saw's primary user interface. ABS Plastic Durable and cheap. Injection Molding. Cost effective and fast method of production. Group15F2012 Trigger.jpeg
Power Connection Cable 1 1 Carries the electrical energy from an external power source to the trigger switch and then to the motor. It also protects the user from the electrical current. Plastic (external casing) and copper (wire) Flexible, durable, and cheap. Injection Molding. Cost effective and fast method of production. Group15F2012 PowerCable.jpeg
Upper Blade Guard 1 1 Acts as a rigid body providing support and stability to the saw. The saw blade is housed here and thus this blade guard provides much needed safety measures by “hiding” the top of the saw. Steel Durability, strength, cost, and safety reasons. Die casting Low cost and efficient for this part/material type (medium complexity) Group15F2012 UpperGuard.jpeg
Bearing 1 1 Main pivoting and connection point where the blade nut acts through the lower/upper blade guards, saw blade and pinion shaft. It is imperative to the operation of the saw. Steel Durability, Strength and cost. Turning Most cost effective method of production for component. Group15F2012 Bearing.jpeg
Short Torx Screws 3 2 Provide removable connection points and stability between two or more parts. (For short distances/limited stability needed) Steel Durability, strength, and cost. Screw cutting lathe. Necessary for the production of screws, cost effective. Group15F2012 ShortTorx.jpeg
Medium Torx Screws 6 3 Provide removable connection points and stability between two or more parts. (For medium distances/some stability needed) Steel Durability, strength, and cost. Screw cutting lathe. Necessary for the production of screws, cost effective. Group15F2012 MediumTorx.jpeg
Long Torx Screws 4 3 Provide removable connection points and stability between two or more parts. (For longer distances/greater stability) Steel Durability, strength, and cost. Screw cutting lathe. Necessary for the production of screws, cost effective. Group15F2012 LongTorx.jpeg
Lower Blade Guard 1 2 Provides a rigid/pivoting structure that “hides” and protects the lower portion of the blade when not in use. It is primarily for safety concerns and adds little stability to the overall product. Steel Durability, Strength, cost, and safety concerns. Die Casting Cheap and cost effective for steel components of low complexity. Group15F2012 LowerGuard.jpeg
Blade Nut 1 1 Passes through the lower blade guard, blade and upper blade guard. It acts as the central pivoting/connection point and is vital to the operation of the saw. Failure here is unacceptable. Steel Durability and strength. Stamped out Cheap and cost effective Group15F2012 BladeNut.jpeg
Inner and Outer Washers 1 1 Distributes the load created by the saw during use. Steel Durability and strength Stamped Cheap and cost effective Group15F2012 InnerOuterWash.jpeg
Tension Spring 1 1 Provides the necessary tension that keeps the lower blade guard in the “closed” position when the saw is not in use (provides a “passive” safety ability that eliminates the need for the user to close the guard after each use). Hardened steel Inexpensive, lightweight, and desired material properties for a spring. Cold winding Necessary for the cost effective production of a spring. Group15F2012 TensionSpring.jpeg
Lower Guard Lift Lever 1 1 Allows the user to disengage the passive safety of the lower blade guard. This is necessary for the saw to be able to cut material. ABS Plastic Inexpensive and lightweight. Durable for the cost. Injection Molding Cost effective and fast for this component material/profile Group15F2012 LGLL.jpeg
Wing Nut 1 1 Pivoting/connection point between the foot of the saw and the upper blade guard. Steel Durable and strong. Forged and stamped, and then drilled (screw hole) Necessary for the manufacture of this part. Cheap and fairly quick. Group15F2012 WingNut.jpeg
Roller Pin 1 1 Provides the main connection between the foot and the upper blade guard. Works using friction caused by the components tendency to expand. Steel Durable and has desired material properties Casting Cheap and quick, allowing for easy mass production Group15F2012 RollerPin.jpeg
Carbon Brush 2 1 Acts as the conductor between the stationary wires and the moving parts. Necessary to complete the electric circuit within the circular saw. Plastic, steel, copper, graphite Desired material properties (copper conductor) and cheap/functional (plastic and steel) Plastic-Injection Molding, Copper-Stamped, Spring-drawn and spun Cheap, fast and cost effective method of production for each part. Group15F2012 CarbonBrush.jpeg
Pinion Shaft 1 1 Takes the energy provided by the motor

and distributes it to the saw blade. Transfers energy through the use of gears.

Steel Relatively cheap, steel is needed due to its strength and durability. Plastic is not recommended here. Steel is first extruded and secondly given teeth. Ends forged for strength Necessary for the desired properties of this part. Relatively cheap. Group15F2012 PinionShaft.jpeg
Handle 1 2 Can be broken down into two separate parts. It provides the main gripping section for the user and this is where most of the ergonomics of the saw are seen. It is a rigid body, but doesn't add support to the main structure. Its rigidity is needed to counteract the forces produced by the saw itself. Must be somewhat aesthetically pleasing. ABS Plastic Cost effect and functional for the part characteristics. Injection Molding. Cheap, fast and cost effective method of production. Group15F2012 Handle.jpeg
C-Ring 1 1 Acts as a static sealing element and helps to redistribute. It also helps to prevent tampering inside of the saw. Steel Strong and durable enough to seal and redistribute forces. Cold winding. Efficient way of mass production, helps to obtain the desired characteristics. Group15F2012 CRing.jpeg
Saw Blade 1 1 Essential component of the saw that takes the rotational energy from the motor and focuses it on the blade tips to provide a cutting force. Can be interchanged with other saws to allow for more versatility. It will need to be replaced after excessive use. Steel with hardened carbide tips. Steel is durable and strong, yet fairly cheap. Carbide tips make the saw last longer for a marginal increase in price. Usually cut out of a sheet of steel using a laser. Rollers put groves onto the saw (for stability), and also flattens them. Later polished and hardened. Carbide tips are soldered (brazed on) Imperative to get the functionality and desired characteristics out of the saw blade. Group15F2012 SawBlade.jpeg
Utility Wrench 1 1 Needed for the removal of the blade nut Steel Strong and durable, but still cheap. Forged (with dies) Fairly cheap and hardens the component to the desired degree. Group15F2012 UtilityWrench.jpeg
Propeller 1 1 Acts in cooperation with the motor to provide an air flow. This provides a cooling effect inside of the saw and also helps to keep sawdust/debris from entering the internal components of the saw. Steel Needed to withstand the high amount of RPM since it is attached to the generator. Fairly cheap. Casting (with Dies) Cheap method of mass production. Group15F2012 Propeller.jpeg
Foot 1 1 The main source for support during the circular saw’s actual use. Without this stability the saw would be very difficult to control and would have limited functionality. Steel Needed for its rigidity, strength, hardness and durability. Plastic could become a safety concern. Casting (with Dies) Cheap method of mass production. Group15F2012 Foot.jpeg

Figure 1. Table of Components

Product Analysis

Component Complexity Scale

Based on the three main factors constituting the manufacturing of a component (Function, Form, and Manufacturing Method), we can create the following chart for the use in assigning complexity ratings to different parts of the circular saw.

For a more accurate complexity rating, the components were broken down into seven smaller subcategories. Function was split into two separate parts, number of functions and motion of part. Form was broken down into aesthetic quality, finish level of product, and complexity of geometry. The manufacturing method portion was sectioned into difficulty of process and the number of processes needed.

All seven of these components are ranked individually on a scale from 1-3. These “points” are then used on the complexity conversion chart to get the corresponding level of complexity. The first tiers of the complexity rating chart consist of a two point gap, the fourth tier has a three point, and the fifth tier a six point. This was done due to the similar nature of many of the circular saw parts and the design of the table outlining the complexity points. If an even distribution of points was done, then the majority of parts would have ended up in the same tier when they shouldn't have. This is because it is very difficult for even a complex component to contain all seven levels of difficulty on a high scale. This method of distribution allows for a more accurate level of final difficulty appraisal. The two-step process also helps to get a more accurate final complexity rating. It has the added benefit of being more detailed, and although there are more parts, each part has a more intuitive description. This allows the rating system to actually work faster than a fewer component, but more complex rating style.

Although this rating scale is not perfect, and some of the rating process is left up to the opinion of the user, it still allows for a fairly accurate comparison of parts used in the circular saw’s manufacture.


Complexity Points # of Primary Functions Motion of Part Aesthetic Quality Needed Finish Level of Product Complexity of Geometry Difficulty of Manufacturing Process # of Processes Needed
1 1 Does not move None/Minimal None/Minimal Low Low 1-2
2 2-3 Constrained movement Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate 3-5
3 4+ Complex/Free movement High High High High 5+


Complexity Rating # of Complexity Points Required
1 7-8
2 9-10
3 11-12
4 13-15
5 16-21

Figure 2. Component Complexity Rating Chart

Component Analysis

Carbon Brushes
  • Component Function

Although they are some of the cheaper internal parts of the circular saw, they are still arguably one of the most important. These carbon brushes are an important intermediate flow channel that helps to transmit electrical energy from stationary wires to a rotating motor shaft. Without this part the motor could not function, and thus the circular saw would be worthless (along with most other modern motors, alternators and generators). They also provide some friction, but that is a necessity to make a proper connection and to transmit the energy. In an ideal case the friction would be eliminated if possible to increase performance. This component operates in a harsh environmental and is constantly being submitted to frictional forces caused by the rotation of the motor. This will be evaluated and explained more in depth in the materials section.

  • Component Form

The general shape of the component is that of a rectangle. One rectangular hole is cut on the front horizontal face, and two smaller ones are cut on the back horizontal face. Another smaller, but movable rectangle extrudes from the primary one. It has a slight indented curve to the front face to hug the shaft and groves. The back end of the rectangle opens up and widens to form a base, but is covered by a thin copper plate. This copper plate is in connection with a copper roller pin extruding from the front horizontal face of the main rectangle. If the base was removed the brush would be both horizontally symmetrical in the YZ and XY plane, but it would not have axial or vertical symmetry. To and from all of the extreme points, the carbon brush measures 13/8” x 1” x 5/8” and weighs approximately ¼ of an ounce.

This component is shaped this way due to economical and functional concerns. The rectangular main body helps to provide rigidity, along with being able to contain the internal spring. The rectangular shape is also easy to work with, shape and modify into its final form. The long and thin copper plate helps to maximize surface area, and thus increase potential contact points while minimizing cost. The graphite rectangle’s curve and groves help to ensure a better connection with the rotating shaft.

The carbon brush is comprised of four different material types. The plastic casing was chosen because of its rigidity and ease of manufacture. However the primary reason for its use is due to its low cost. This allows the savings to be passed onto the consumer, allowing for a cheaper product. The copper is used for the primary transfer of electrical energy through this component. Copper was chosen due to its relatively low cost and conductive properties. Copper was shaped into the base plate and a roller pin to provide contact with stationary wires. A string of bundled copper wire also runs through the spring inside of the plastic casing. This wire transfers the electrical energy from the copper plate to the graphite brush at the end. The brush’s material was carefully chosen to help mitigate slippage with the motor shaft while still transferring electrical energy. Friction was also intended to be minimal. Graphite is a conductor, but it has the added quality of being “soft” which allows it to slowly wear away. This is not ideal, but necessary for the function of the part since it provides a smoother connection. Steel was chosen for the spring since it is economical and also easily worked with. The spring provides a force to the graphite brush which keeps it in contact with the shaft as it slowly wears away, allowing it to be used even as its size shrinks.

As stated above manufacture processes were not the main concern in the selection of these materials. The main driving factor was the dire for low cost, but still dependable and functional components (thus an economical factor). Globally all of these materials are widely available allowing the product to be manufactured in a multitude of different locations promoting versatility in the production process.

This component has virtually no aesthetic properties; it is purely for functional reasons. Proof of this is the fact that it is not visible to the consumer unless the product is completely stripped apart. The plastic parts of the component are black, with the graphite being grey and the copper bronze. The black finish was chosen primarily for cost reasons, while the grey and bronze colors are the inherent colors of the materials being used. The plastic has a smooth/glossy finish, but this is due to the manufacturing process and not so much for a functional reason. The graphite however does have a rough characteristic to it, and this is to provide clean contact with the motor shaft.

  • Manufacturing Methods

Different manufacturing processes were used for the different materials. The central plastic casing was injection molded. This is evident due to the ejector pin marks at the top of the component. A minor deformation can also be seen on the product which was probably due to an uneven filling of the mold. The copper portion, being primarily flat, was stamped out. The small tubular portion was rolled to acquire its designated shape. The steel springs were first drawn out into a wire like substance and finally spun into its final shape. Minimal evidence of the last two methods exists because they are partially hidden by the plastic casing. The nature of both processes also leaves little evidence behind as well. The material choices did have some impact on the processes chosen. Injection molding is a common, fast, and cost effective method of plastic parts of low to high complexity. The plastic casing fits this profile perfectly. However the copper plate and steel spring’s material choice had little impact on their manufacture processes. Their overall shape and desired functions had much more of an impact. All of these processes were chosen for a few different reasons. First, their relatively low cost contributes to the desire to be economical, helping to pass the savings on to potential customers and the manufacturer alike. The ease of these processes also allows this product to be made universally on a global scale. This allows for more variety and flexibility in the manufacture process and where it is ultimately done. Furthermore injection molding wastes little material making it an excellent choice to reduce the company’s net environmental impact.

Group15F2012 CarbonEvi.jpg

Figure 3. Manufacturing Method Evidence for Carbon Brushes
  • Complexity Rating

Using the chart (Figure 2) defined earlier in this report we will now analyze the complexity of this part. The carbon brush only has one primary function, transferring electricity from the stationary wires to the moving shaft (1). Motion within the part does happen due to the spring and external forces caused by the rotating shaft. However this motion is constrained (2). This is an internal part and not seen by the user, its aesthetic quality needed is minimal (1). The finish level of the product is also minimal due to the nature of the part (1). The carbon brush does have a moderately complex geometry however due to the various holes, gaps and shapes comprising it (2). The difficulty of the manufacture processes average to have a moderate difficulty (2). The number of processes needed for the completion of this part is over five, due to all of the different materials (3). Summing all of the complexity points we get the number 12, which gives this part a complexity of 3 using the conversion chart (Figure 3).

Saw Blade
  • Component Function

The saw blade is an integral component of the circular saw. It is also the only real part of the saw that can be interchanged freely to allow more versatility. The saw blade is the primary cutting agent of the circular saw and thus has a lot to do with the performance of the entire product. A poorly made blade is not only inefficient, but also dangerous to use. The circular saw blade takes rotational energy from the motor and uses its inertia to cut through solid objects. Friction and material forces counteract the applied rotational energy gained through electromagnetic conversion. The saw blade is “open” (not protected) so it has direct contact with the environment. However since it is a corded (and not battery operated) the product will primarily be used indoors where environmental concerns are limited. The circular saw’s working environment can range from a relatively clean garage to dusty factory. The garage is the more likely scenario since this is a relatively low end product and designed for the average consumer.

  • Component Form

The overall shape of the circular saw is that of a circle; however teeth are cut into the edges. It has axial, horizontal and vertical symmetry (since it is a circle). The product does have three dimensions, but its primary characteristics are present in a two dimensional configuration. The blades shape is due to the attempt to maximize cutting efficiency, while still providing a durable and resilient product. If the blade was too thick its cutting efficiency would be decreased and it would waste material while cutting. However if the blade is too thin it would wear out quicker and also be more prone to damage. This particular blade has a diameter of 7 ¼” and a width of slightly under ¼”. The total weight of the blade is slightly over one pound.

Circular saw blades are primarily made of steel. Steel was chosen due to its cost to strength ratio. It is also widely available and easier to work with than some other metals. The strength of steel is also a big advantage since it will have to endure a wide range of rotational and counteractive resistive forces. Most saw blades also have carbide tips added to them to increase performance and longevity. The tip material was chosen due to its material properties. For its cost ratio and availability it helps to prolong the life of the saw and enhance performance more than most other available materials. As stated above the material choices were largely driven for economic purposes. However both materials are also widely available on a global scale. This allows them to be manufactured in different locations with ease. Also by prolonging the overall life of the blade through the use of carbide tips the net waste of the product is reduced. The blades are able to last much longer, thus lowering the disposal rate and ultimately how many blades end up in a landfill or that need to be recycled. This decreases the impact on the environment significantly. On a societal front, the steel also helps to ensure a high level of safety and functionality to the consumer.

The aesthetic properties of the saw are of a limited and secondary nature. The smoothness and fine surface finish of the blade helps to increase performance; however it does give the blade a more professional and reliable look. A blade with a rough finish would give off the appearance of being unreliable and potentially dangerous, so some aesthetic appeal can came into play. Additionally component is mostly grey, but that is only because that is the color of ordinary steel.

  • Manufacturing Methods

Circular saw blades are initially cut out of a sheet of steel, a laser is usually used here. This gives the saw its general appearance, including its teeth. The blades are then fed into rollers that press groves onto both sides. These act as tension rings that help to decrease vibration within the blade and to increase its durability. Without these groves the blade would not cut straight. The blade is then fed into a different type of roller that forces the disk into a completely flat shape. This helps to eliminate any abnormalities present in the original sheet metal. A grinding wheel then polishes the blade giving it a smoother finish, enhancing its look and reducing the friction it will face while in use. The disks are then baked in an industrial oven to increase their hardness. Once the steel portion of the blade is finished carbide tips are applied to each of the saw’s teeth. The carbide tips are first cut, their precision is confirmed with a laser, and finally they are brazed onto the actual saw blade. Evidence of these processes is limited due to the lack of characteristic left by these methods. However we can take this lack of evidence as a form of proof itself. For example laser cutting will not leave any ejector or riser marks. The only real visible evidence of any manufacture method is the heat/fusion marks left by the brazing process. These processes are not catered to the materials selected for the circular saw blades. In fact it is arguably the opposite. Steel was chosen due to its cost, availability, and ease of alteration. Having a material that is easy to work with makes the manufacture process much easier. The shape of the saw blade was a decisive factor in the processes selected however. The simplistic, circular and ultimately thin profile makes it the perfect component to be laser cut out of sheet metal. It is albeit wasteful on material, but it ensures a durable final product free of most impurities and weaknesses due even flows and/or cooling. Ultimately this boils down to economic and societal concerns. This method of manufacture ensures a safe product for its users, but is still relatively cheap allowing for a low cost final product that can still net the manufacturer a sales profit. An added benefit is that steel and carbide are relatively common materials allowing them to be manufactured globally with ease.

Group15F2012 SawBladeEvi.jpg

Figure 4. Manufacturing Evidence for Saw Blade
  • Complexity Rating

Using the chart (Figure 2) defined earlier in this report we will now analyze the complexity of this part. The saw blade only has one primary function, which is the cutting of material (1). Motion does occur, however it is constrained and occurs only about an axis (2). The aesthetic quality of the saw blade is minimal (1), however its finish level is high to ensure an efficient product (3). The complexity of the geometry itself is low being a simple two dimension shape (1), but the difficulty of the manufacture processes are of a moderate level (2). The two types of rolling, laser cutting, heat tempering and soldering validates my assessment of that assumption. This ties into the number of processes needed, which as we see is over five (3). Summing all of the complexity points we get a net score of 13, and thus a level 4 on the complexity scale.

Trigger
  • Component Function

The main function of the trigger is to act as the main interface between the user and the circular saw. The trigger senses the input from the user, and then uses that input to determine if the saw should activate or remain off. This is a relatively basic trigger and it only has two essential positions, on or off. No variable levels of speed or achievable with this trigger. However that is by design. During circular saw cutting applications maximum speed is usually preferred as it allows for smoother and quicker cuts. Having a variable sensing trigger could complicate the users experience and potentially become a safety hazard. The cost of the circular saw would also increase. There are some genuine, but limited applications of having a variable sensing trigger on a circular saw. However the raw economical costs coupled with the risks to user safety make a basic trigger the better option. Half of the trigger is exposed, while the other half is protected by the handle. This means that the trigger is susceptible to outside conditions. Being a corded product though, the primary use of this circular saw will be indoors. Its working conditions can range widely from a relatively clean home, to a dusty factory. Since this is a lower end product it will tend to see much more household use than industrial use.

  • Component Form

The main shape of the trigger itself is that of a black rectangle. The center of the trigger is moderately concave, with its slope asymmetrically distributed to the top and bottom portions. This helps to produce an ergonomic effect that reduces fatigue and wear on the user’s finger during prolonged operation. Attached to the main trigger is a black rectangle that houses the vital electrical components of the trigger. This mechanism is hidden when the circular saw is fully assembled however. Symmetry is limited, but it can be argued that horizontal symmetry does exist in the YZ plane. This component is three dimensional by design, since it would fairly difficult to fit electrical components inside of a two or one dimensional object. Not to mention that it would be rather uncomfortable to use a two dimensional trigger. This component is measured at roughly 2” x ½” x 1.5” from extreme end to extreme end. It also weighs roughly 3 ounces.

This component is entirely compromised from plastic (except for the internal circuits). Plastic was chosen since this module will not be experiencing any extreme forces, so a more durable material is not needed. Plastic is also very cheap compared to most materials. It is also easy to work with and can be conformed into a variety of shapes with minimal effort along with coming in a range of colors. Plastic is also more comfortable when it make contact with human skin than some other materials, like steel for example. Multiple contributing factors can be seen to come into play for these decisions. The dark black color contrasts with the red handle and helps to attract the user’s eye to the trigger. This helps to make it more universally accessible on a global scale. The selection of plastic was due to its low cost, along with the notable reasons mentioned above. These all contribute to plastics economic reasons for selection. Also environmentally the plastic components can be melted down and recycled with relative ease.

Aesthetically the triggers functions are limited. However the same attributes that make it aesthetically pleasing also make it a better designed product. The concave shape of the trigger along with its smooth finish lets a potential buyer know that they can use the product for long periods of time with low finger fatigue/discomfort. The black color contrasting against the red handle also lets a potential buyer/user easily see the trigger component. This is important across language barriers and makes the trigger more universal.

  • Manufacturing Methods

Injection molding was used to create the trigger system. A four step process was used during the manufacture of the trigger however since the trigger is integrally composed of four separate parts. The main body is comprised of two hollow shells that are held together by a tamper resistant screw. The actual trigger and top push switch were molded separately as well. They were fitted together to complete their form. Evidence of this process can be seen through ejector marks on the head and body of the shell. The shape and material of the part can also help in the determination of the process used. Injection molding was selected because it is a viable and economical method of production of both simple and complex plastic parts. It is also accomplished with relative ease and can thus be completed easily in different regions around the world. However the main driving factor is its economic properties, allowing for a cheaper product to be sold. Injection molding is also easy on the environment since little material is wasted during the process.

Group15F2012 TriggerEvi.jpg

Figure 5. Manufacturing Method Evidence for Trigger
  • Complexity Rating

Using the chart (Figure 2) defined earlier in this report we will now analyze the complexity of this part. The trigger has two primary functions, to sense user input and to act as a switch/gate for the electrical energy entering it (2). The part does move, however it is heavily restrained and limited (2). The aesthetic quality is minimal, yet still necessary. However most of the product is hidden within the blade so a minimal rating is justified (1). The finish level of the product must ensure a comfortable grip for the user, netting it a moderate desired finish level (2). The complexity of geometry is moderate also due to the various curves and extrusions present on the component (2). The manufacture process consists primarily of injection molding, a relatively simple process for plastic components (1). The sheer number of manufacture processes for the shell of this component is four, due to the split molding of the two sides, the trigger itself and the top piece (2). Summing all of the complexity points we get a net score of 12, and thus a complexity rating of 3.

Central Power Cable
  • Component Function

The primary function of the central power cable is to deliver electrical energy from a power source to the saw’s motor. However the power cable first passes electricity through the trigger before it reaches its final destination. This cable preforms only a single main function, however secondary functions such as safety (due to the insulation properties of the casing) are also present. This component functions in the open and is not protected by auxiliary materials except for its own. Since this is a corded saw its outdoor use would be minimal and most of its work will be done indoors. Also being a lower end product it will primarily be used by home owners, and thus operate inside of the typical home most frequently.

  • Component Form

The general shape of the central power cable is that of a long cylindrical tube/cylinder with an approximate radius of 2/8” and overall length of 5’. However that generic shape changes on both ends. One end enlarges into the power plug, with the various groves and rounded surfaces common on most commercial cables. It is much more rectangular in shape than the main cable. Its rough dimensions at its extreme points are roughly 6.9/8” x 6.1/8” x 1”. The two prongs sticking out of it are 7/16” about, a universal standard that ensures the correct fit into the outlet. The opposite end that is connected to the actual circular saw has less of an extreme change in shape. Its circumference slowly grows for about two and a half inches before rounding off at its largest diameter of 5/8”. It then splits into two much smaller cables; however these are different components that will not be discussed in this section. The majority of the cable is symmetrical about the axis, excluding the power plug. However the entire cable is symmetrical if cut perfectly horizontally or along the central line looking down at the product. This products shape/profile is primarily in one dimension, since it is only used/carries energy in one plane (simplified case). This shape is due to a few reasons. First of all the cable shell needs to be large enough to not only carry the internal wiring, but thick enough to provide insulation (for safety) and protection (for the delicate internal wires). The length needs to be long enough to allow the user a big enough range of motion to perform various tasks, but not too long where it becomes a burden or difficult to transport. The full cable weighs a little less than two pounds.

The cable is made (for the most part) entirely from rubber. Manufacturing processes had nothing to do with this decision since very few economical options exist for an insulated, cheap, and flexible material. Two main material properties exist to make a good cable, flexibility and to be an insulator. Global factors influencing its design is the desire to for it to be durable and useable (to a practical degree) in a wide variety of climates. Rubber is also widely available in most areas. Although this circular saw is not intended to be used in the rain, the rubber coating would provide some protection to the internal wires. Economically the cheap cost of rubber makes it a prime candidate for use on a power cable. Its low cost keeps the overall price of the saw lower, allowing the manufacturer the ability to pass on the savings to the customer.

This component does not have a purpose on a pure aesthetic viewpoint. However a nicer looking/finished product drives more sales because it looks more reliable, functional and professional. The color of the cable is a dark black. This helps the cable to blend in, or at the very least be unobtrusive visually. Bright colors would be disruptive and unwanted even if they are more easily seen thus helping to prevent tripping. The surface finish of the product is very smooth and almost glossy. This is for both aesthetic and functional purposes. As stated above the smoothness attributes to the esthetic appeal which helps to promote a better quality product. On a functional level the finish helps to mitigate potential snags, and it is also easier to handle.

  • Manufacturing Methods

The method of manufacturing for this component was injection molding. Evidence can be seen on both the power plug and the connection base where parting lines are both visible. Injection molding is a great way to mass produce rubber products economically and with relative ease. The shape is also a contributing factor, especially for both end pieces. However since the shape is so basic it had little weight on the overall decision for its manufacture. Various other factors came into play during the decision to choose the process however. Injection molding (on an economical and environmental standpoint) wastes little material, making it both cost effective and better for the environmental. Also the relative ease of the process makes it a viable option in manufacture plants around the globe.

Group15F2012 PCableEvu.jpg

Figure 6. Manufacturing Method Evidence for Central Power Cable
  • Complexity Rating

Using the chart (Figure 2) defined earlier in this report we will now analyze the complexity of this part. This cable does preform two functions, the assisted transportation of electricity and the insulation of the wires; however only one is a primary function (1). This part does not have any inherent movement associated with it (1). The aesthetic quality of this component is also minimal. It must have some appealing qualities, but its function is actually to blend in (1). The finish level is also minimal, with enough of a finish level coming from the injection molding process (1). The actual difficulty of manufacture is also low due to the simple geometry and injection molding (1). It does however require a three step injection molding process comprising of the central wire, body and head (2). This results in a net complexity point score of 8, and thus a complexity rating of 1.

Solid Modeled Assembly

Introduction
Component and Assembly Models

Engineering Analysis

Introduction

The saw blade is one of the most important components of the circular saw because it is primarily responsible for the action that the device performs. In order for the circular saw to cut material, the proper amount of torque must be applied to the pinion shaft by the motor so that the blade may reach the appropriate number of revolutions per minute. The torque is transmitted from the motor to the saw blade through the use of gears and this makes it possible for an engineer to use the relationships between them to help design the blade or other parts of the circular saw. This is important because too much torque could damage components such as the pinion shaft if it cannot withstand the torsion resulting from turning the blade. However, too little torque will not enable the saw to cut through the material. Changing the number of teeth or the radius of the gears can also alter the effects on the saw blade by the torque produced from the motor.

Problem Statement

An engineer might need to determine the torque needed to be supplied by the circular saw’s motor in order to accelerate the saw blade to its maximum angular velocity. In order to do this, they would need to create a mathematical model that relates the maximum angular velocity and the torque needed to achieve it. In addition, the engineer would need to know an approximate amount of time in which they would like the saw to accelerate to a full speed in.

Diagram

Group15F2012 SBdiagram.jpeg

Figure 7. Diagram of relations between saw blade, pinion shaft, and motor.

In this model, the following assumptions are made; the saw is modeled as a solid disk, parts to not degrade or deform over time, all power supplied to the motor is used to generate torque, no energy loss due to heat or friction, components are not subjected to any other forces, saw will be accelerating without making contact with material being cut, any form of air resistance against saw blade during acceleration is negligible, gears and pinion shaft do not slip, and the time needed to accelerate the blade has already been predetermined by the engineer.

Governing Equations

Group15F2012 SBequations.jpeg

Figure 8. Governing Equations in Engineering Analysis
Calculations

Group15F2012 SBCalculations.jpeg

Figure 9. Calculation of Torque in Engineering Analysis
Solution Check

Dimensions are consistent with what is asked, no mathematical errors.

Discussion

The torque required as a result of using the equation derived in the previous part of the analysis assumes that no energy is lost due to friction, heat, or any external forces. If these were included in another analysis, then the actual amount of torque needed would be higher in order to make up for these losses in energy. In addition, it is also assumed that the materials are ideal and will not be deformed by forces acting upon them. With this in consideration, stronger materials would need to be used for higher amounts of torque to decrease the chances of the part failing during the saw’s usage. In addition, further analysis will be needed to determine the torque necessary to cut different types of materials since this analysis only deals with the acceleration of the blade without it actually cutting anything. Based on the variables in this derived equation, it is apparent that the motor will need to produce more torque for a blade with a larger diameter or larger mass. In addition, more torque will be necessary in order to accelerate the blade in a smaller period of time. Another interesting observation is that that the ratio of the radius of the shaft of the motor to the radius of the pinion shaft makes a large difference in the torque required. If the pinion has a larger radius than the motor shaft, then less torque will need to be provided (which is expected based on the relationship of torque and gear ratio). This information can be useful for an engineer if they wish to determine what sizes of shafts will be necessary inside of the machine, especially with spacial constraints on inside of the saw itself. It will also be useful in designing a saw blade to fit within a certain sized set of blade guards.

Design Revisions

Handle
  • The first component revision considered for the circular saw is exchanging the plastic material and style of grip on the already existing model for a more ergonomic rubber grip. A construction worker or person working in their garage on a warm day will most likely have sweat form on their hands and a smooth plastic surface is not a very good type of interface for them to work with. This can become a serious safety hazard to the user and those around them because in the event that they lose control, the saw could slip from their grasp while the blade is still in motion. By changing the handle to a rubber grip, the safety of the product would increase greatly for the average user because it would provide them with a surface of greater friction to work with. A more ergonomic shape would also make the product more comfortable to work with over extended periods of time and would also increase the safety of the tool because it would allow the user to have a more intuitive grasp and better control of the saw. In addition, ability of the user to control the saw accurately would also increase by allowing the user to have a steadier grip on the tool, thus making it easier for them to guide it. The process of manufacturing the grip wouldn't be very expensive because it would most likely be made using injection molding. This is economically beneficial during manufacturing because the molds used to create the grip could be re-used over again and the grips could be produced very quickly. The grip would cost more to produce and take extra time to put onto the circular saw, but this change would greatly benefit the safety of the users. In addition, this added safety feature would also make the saw look like a more attractive option to consumers because of its added safety precaution.

Group15F2012 HandleRev.jpeg

Figure 10. Handle Revision Suggestion [1]
Torx Screws
  • Another revision on the component level is changing the types of screws that secure some of the parts of the circular saw. For example, the current model uses Torx screws to hold the handle halves together. The average person usually keeps Phillips or slot screw drivers in their tool set, but not necessarily a Torx head screw driver. One might argue that this is done purposefully so that the average user doesn't tamper with the circular saw and impact its overall safety; however there are basic repairs that may be performed by separating the handle halves. For example, a person with knowledge of basic soldering would be able to repair the wires connecting the trigger to the 120V field in the event that they become severed over a long period of use. It would be difficult for the user to remove the screws if they don’t possess a Torx screwdriver head, but changing it to a Phillips head would allow them to have easy access to that component for repairs. This could also help the user save money because they could fix the inside of the saw by themselves instead of having to take it in to have repairs done. The screws on the blade guards and components of the saw that are essential to safety involving the blade should not be removed because tampering with any of those parts could seriously increase the risk of the user hurting themselves in the event that they re-assemble the tool incorrectly and attempt to use it again.

Group15F2012 TorxRev.jpeg

Figure_. Torx Screw Revision Suggestion
Exhaust Cover
  • Another component to make changes to is the exhaust cover on the back of the motor housing. The current model features two screws that insert directly into the front of the exhaust cover and into the interior of the casing. In addition, the Skilsaw logo is molded into the plastic grill running across the cover. Both of these features can hinder air flow and can allow material to get caught in them. If this were to happen, then the user would have to unscrew the exhaust cover and then manually empty the contents out by themselves. A possible redesign of the exhaust cover would feature screws that are inserted along or directly into the side of the motor housing so that they don’t inhibit the flow out of the grill. In addition, the molded logo would be removed and instead it would be placed somewhere plainly visible on the side of the motor housing. This revision would increase the safety of the circular saw by ensuring that there is no blockage in the exhaust and can help increase performance by increasing the area in which hot hair may flow out of the motor housing. Blockage would be detrimental to the circular saw because it would lower the rate at which heat is removed from the motor and could even start an electrical fire if the material in the blockage reaches too high of a temperature. Economically, it may be more expensive to place the screws somewhere else and have the logo applied in a different area instead of having it placed directly onto the tool during manufacturing, however the increase in safety would be worth the redesign. The spacing between the horizontal plastic pieces in the exhaust cover would remain at the same distance because increasing it any more might result in the user accidentally inserting foreign objects into the motor housing and potentially damaging moving parts. In addition, it could be a safety hazard if the user accidentally gets anything connected to them caught inside of the tool while it is in motion.

Group15F2012 ExhaustCoverRev.jpeg

Figure_. Exhaust Cover Revision Suggestion

Citations

[1] Handle Design Revision:

http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw/resources/member/15464/productcatalog/2aee2c7a-83a9-4c85-b451-41166b21e147_NB_NO102.jpg

[2] ESA Manufacturing Process Characteristics:

http://guidebook.dcma.mil/226/226-3/Important_Manufacturing_Process_List.htm

[3] How It's Made - Circular Sawblades:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIpXN1aH71Y

[4] Manufacturing Processes:

http://engineeronadisk.com/V2/hugh_jack_phd/engineeronadisk-40.html