Difference between revisions of "Delivery: Gate 5"

From GICL Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gate 2)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
==Gate 2==
 
==Gate 2==
#Overall
+
#Preliminary Project Review
#*Added section about parts being intended to be disassembled or not
+
#*Stated how we will overcome future challenges
#Project Management
+
#Product Dissection  
#*Added statements about the efficiency of current plan
+
#*Identified challenges
#*Added statements about current and future challenges
+
#*Elaborated on difficulty scale
#Product Dissection Plan
+
#*Added text to subsystem documentation
#*Revised difficulty scale and added explanations
+
#*Explained why subsystems are connected
#Product Dissection Assessment
+
#*Explained implementation and arrangement of subsystems
#*Documented physical and energy connections of subsystems
+
#Professionalism
#*Stated environmental concerns of connections of subsystems
+
#*Added labels and captions
#*Stated which subsystems can not be adjacent
+
  
 
==Gate 3==
 
==Gate 3==

Revision as of 14:56, 14 December 2011

Contents

Finalization of Deliverables

This section lists the revisions made in each gate.

Gate 1

  1. Work Proposal
    • Added how long each step will take
    • Added section about needed skills to be developed
  2. Management Proposal
    • Stated how many people must be present to make a decision
  3. Product Archaeology
    • Gave examples for complexity profile
    • Elaborated on user interactions
    • Added text and discussion to product alternative profile

Gate 2

  1. Preliminary Project Review
    • Stated how we will overcome future challenges
  2. Product Dissection
    • Identified challenges
    • Elaborated on difficulty scale
    • Added text to subsystem documentation
    • Explained why subsystems are connected
    • Explained implementation and arrangement of subsystems
  3. Professionalism
    • Added labels and captions

Gate 3

  1. Overall
    • Added figure labels
    • Improved formatting
  2. Coordination Review
    • Documented the effectiveness of the new time management plan
  3. Product Analysis
    • Noted that plastic is not included in the analysis of the steering column
    • Improved difficulty scale
  4. Engineering analysis
    • Documented how gear reduction analysis will be used in designing/testing the product
  5. Design revisions
    • Stated how the the frame will be reinforced in the design revision section
    • Added image of the rear axle revision

Gate 4

  1. Product Archeology
    • Measured the difficulty scale on better terms(i.e technical knowledge e.t.c)
    • Added Original assembly documentation
  2. Design Revisions
    • Addressed more societal concerns

Oral Presentation

The follow images depicts the presentation used during the groups oral presentation done in class.